Michael Jordan Versus LeBron James: Who Is the GOAT?

Updated on June 24, 2020
JesseUnk profile image

Jesse is a lifelong sports fan with a passion for finding the facts. His writing has been recognized and published by Sports Illustrated.

Who's the GOAT, LeBron James or Michael Jordan?

Credit artist: Ryan "Rockeverywear" Weiss https://etsy.me/2KyZV46
Credit artist: Ryan "Rockeverywear" Weiss https://etsy.me/2KyZV46 | Source

History of Michael Jordan and LeBron James

Ever since LeBron James was deemed as The Chosen One, there has been a conversation about whether he could surpass Michael Jordan as the greatest of all time. He grew up idolizing MJ, dressing like him, wearing his shoes, and studying his play style. Once he joined the league, he even donned his number 23.

LeBron has recently appeared in his eighth straight NBA Finals series. He has nine in total and now holds a record of 3–6. Jordan, as we all know, has six rings in six appearances. Oftentimes, the rings argument is what puts MJ ahead of LeBron in debates on who is the GOAT. However, rings shouldn't carry that much weight. If they did, the greatest player ever would be Bill Russell, who won 11 championships in his 13-year career.

Who is considered the GOAT of basketball is important because of the impact one player can have on the game. Unlike football, where 53 men play, basketball teams can be completely changed by one man. In order to end this debate of who's the greatest, one needs to look at the key factors that would determine who the greatest of all time is.

LeBron Sports Illustrated Cover
LeBron Sports Illustrated Cover

Jordan and James Career Accolades

LeBron James
Michael Jordan
Advantage
Future Hall of Famer
Hall of Famer
Equal
3x NBA Champion (3-6 Finals Record)
6x NBA Champion (6-0 Finals Record
Jordan
3x NBA Final MVP
6x NBA Finals MVP
Jordan
4x MVP
5x MVP
Jordan
15x All Star
14x All Star
James
15x All NBA Team
11x All NBA Team
James
6x All Defensive Player
9x All Defensive Player (87-88 Defensive Player of the Year)
Jordan
03-04 Rookie of the Year
84-85 Rookie of the Year
Equal
Michael Jordan Trophies
Michael Jordan Trophies

Why Michael Jordan Is the GOAT

Currently, Jordan holds a lead in all accolades minus Rookie of the Year, All-Star appearances, All-NBA Team, and Hall of Fame. He has a better Finals record as well as three more rings than LeBron. He also has three more All-Defense selections and one more MVP award. He also has a Defensive Player of the Year award, an accomplishment that has eluded James. While LeBron could surpass Jordan in All-Defense selections, it is hard to believe that he will be able to win four rings to best Jordan's six.

LeBron James vs. Michael Jordan Stats

Player
Points Per Game
Rebounds Per Game
Assists Per Game
Field Goal Percentage
Three-Point Field Goal Percentage
Free Throw Percentage
Player Efficiency Rating
Steals Per Game
Blocks Per Game
Turnovers Per Game
LeBron James
27.1
7.4
7.4
50.4
34.3
73.5
27.5
1.6
.8
3.5
Michael Jordan
30.1
6.2
5.3
49.7
32.7
83.5
27.9
2.3
.8
2.7

LeBron James vs Michael Jordan Finals Stats

Player
Record
Points Per Game
Rebounds Per Game
Assists Per Game
Field Goal Percentage
Three-Point Field Goal Percentage
Free Throw Percentage
Steals Per Game
Blocks Per Game
Turnovers Per Game
LeBron James
3–6
28.2
10
7.7
47.4
32.9
72.5
1.75
.87
4.0
Michael Jordan
6–0
33.6
6.0
5.9
48.4
34.3
82.1
1.77
.65
2.82

Why King James Is the GOAT

LeBron James' statistics indicate that he is a much better overall basketball player. While Jordan scored more overall, LeBron is a more efficient scorer. He has a better shooting percentage overall; he also shoots better at the three-point line, despite taking fewer shots. LeBron is also a much better passer and rebounder than Jordan ever was. MJ has a much better free throw percentage, which helps to bolster that points per game statistic. The two are almost even in efficiency ratings, with Michael being first overall in NBA history, and LeBron trailing slightly at second. Michael averaged more steals per game, but both players are dead even in blocks per game. LeBron turned the ball over more per game as well. What these career stats show is that King James is capable of excelling in all aspects of the game, not just in scoring.

In the Finals, LeBron loses his advantage in shooting efficiency but excels even higher above Jordan in his rebounding and passing ability. He also takes an advantage over Jordan defensively, leading in blocks and nearly equaling him in steals. Jordan won more games and thus has a greater overall record in the Finals. On an individual performance level, however, LeBron excels in more categories than Jordan in both their regular-season careers and Finals.

Jordan LeBron Game Winners
Jordan LeBron Game Winners

Who Was More Clutch, LeBron or Jordan?

One of the most important parts of basketball is being able to hit the big shots when your team needs it. If you're going to be an alpha male, lead your team, and be considered the greatest ever, then you have to be able to step up with cold blood and win a game. Jordan is revered for being one of the most clutch players ever. LeBron, on the other hand, has been criticized his entire career for his lack of "clutchness" compared to MJ or even Kobe. I compiled all of LeBron and Michael's playoff statistics and compared their career numbers to games in which they faced elimination, as well as games in which they could eliminate their opponents. The results are as follows:

LeBron vs. Jordan Clutch Statistics

 
Field Goal %
Free Throw %
Total Rebounds
Total Assists
Total Steals
Total Blocks
Turnovers
Points
Win/Loss
Michael Jordan Career
49.7%
83.5%
6.2
5.3
2.3
.8
2.7
30.1
 
Jordan Eliminating Opponents
40.7% (-9%)
84.6% (+1.1%)
4.8 (-1.4)
3.2 (-2.1)
1.5 (-.8)
.2 (-.6)
1.9 (-.8)
29.8 (-.3)
30-10
Jordan Facing Elimination
48.1% (-1.6%)
77.8% (-5.7%)
7.9 (+1.7)
7 (+1.7)
1.6 (-.7)
1.3 (+.5)
4.2 (+1.5)
32.8 (+2.7)
5-7
LeBron James Career
50.4%
73.9%
7.4
7.2
1.6
.8
3.5
27.2
 
LeBron Eliminating Opponents
52.9% (+2.5%)
70.6% (-3.3%)
8.7 (+1.3)
7.6 (+.4)
1.8 (+.2)
1.4 (+.6)
3.9 (+.4)
28.8 (+1.6)
35-10
LeBron Facing Elimination
53.9% (+3.5%)
66% (-7.9%)
13 (+5.6)
9 (+1.8)
2.4 (+.8)
1.8 (+1)
2.2 (-1.7)
36.4 (+9.2)
14-10

LeBron Is More Clutch than Jordan

The statistics show one thing clearly, LeBron steps up in the clutch far more strongly than Jordan did. When facing a chance to eliminate an opponent, Jordan was 30-10, or won 75% of the time. Of the eight main statistical categories, his numbers dropped in each except for free throw percentage and turnovers. He shot 9% worse, had 1.4 fewer rebounds, 2.1 fewer assists, .8 fewer steals, and .6 fewer blocks. His only impressive improvement was having .8 fewer turnovers in such games. His scoring efficiency, assists and rebounds, and overall defense all lacked in games where he could put opponents away.

However, when facing elimination Jordan stepped up in some ways. He's 5-7 in his career in elimination games, boasting a winning percentage of only 41.6%. Facing elimination, Jordan's field goal percentage, free throw percentage, steals, and turnovers all got worse. He improved in rebounds, assists, blocks, and points. While he shot worse slightly, he did score 2.7 more points per game. His rebounds and assists improved well by 1.7 each per game. However, he missed 5.7% more free throws facing elimination and turned the ball over 1.5 more times per game.

LeBron, when facing a chance to eliminate his opponent, boasts a record of 35-10, or a 77.8% winning percentage. Of the eight main statistical categories, he improved in six. His field goal percentage, rebounds, assists, steals, blocks, and points per game all improved. He shot 2.5% better overall, added 1.3 more rebounds, .6 more blocks, and 1.6 more points. His free throw percentage falls 3.3%, and he turns the ball over .4 more times per game. James simply gets a little more involved in games where he can finish his opponents, but many of his numbers only slightly increase in these situations.

When James is facing elimination he completely changes. Of the eight main statistical categories, he improves in seven. He shoots 3.5% better, adds 5.6 more rebounds per game, 1.8 more assists, .8 more steals, 1 more block per game, 1.3 fewer turnovers, and 9.2 more points. His only downside is his free throw percentage drops 7.9% when facing elimination. LeBron plays at a completely different level when facing elimination. He improves in his on-court efficiency in every way imaginable; scoring, rebounding, getting others involved, he vastly improves defensively, and he turns the ball over less.

In conclusion, LeBron is much more clutch than Jordan. When the two smelled blood and had a chance to eliminate their opponents, LeBron wins 2.7% more often. When their backs are against the wall, LeBron wins 16.7% more often. Jordan only improved slightly in a few categories when facing elimination. LeBron improved in almost every single category and improved incredibly when facing elimination. To say LeBron doesn't play better and more clutch in crunch time situations is absurd. LeBron James has also hit more buzzer beaters than Jordan, and more go-ahead shots with five seconds to go in the game. His field goal percentage on these shots is also higher than Jordan's. You can see the statistics and video evidence of each of their made shots below.

Jordan vs. LeBron Clutch Shots Postseason

 
Field Goals
Field Goal %
Buzzer Beaters
Jordan
5-11
45.5%
3
LeBron
7-15
46.7%
5

Who Is More Clutch, LeBron or Jordan?

Who do you feel is more clutch between LeBron and Jordan?

See results
Crying Jordan Meme
Crying Jordan Meme

Did Jordan Play in a Weak League?

Michael Jordan won his six rings in 1991, 1992, 1993, 1996, 1997, and 1998. He has two three-peat performances that were separated by a short stint in baseball. While many believe this solidifies him as the greatest, they often fail to look at the league surrounding him at the time.

Between the years of 1988 and 1995, the NBA expanded. Six teams were added; Hornets (88), Heat (88), Magic (89), Timberwolves (89), Raptors (95), and Grizzlies (95). The following stats cover the time between their creation and their first playoff appearance as a team. They will include their overall game record, the number of games played against Michael, the overall record of Jordan vs that team in those years, and their playoff record against each other if applicable.

Charlotte Hornets: First playoff appearance in 1993

  • 1988-1993 (Combined record of 140-270)
  • 88-89: 5 Games, 4-1
  • 89-90: 2 Games, 2-0
  • 90-91:5 Games, 5-0
  • 91-92: 4 Games, 4-0
  • 92-93: 5 Games, 3-2
  • Playoffs: N/A

Miami Heat: First playoff appearance in 1992

  • 1988-1992 (Combined record of 95-233)
  • 88-89: 2 Games, 2-0
  • 89-90: 4 Games, 4-0
  • 90-91: 4 Games, 4-0
  • 91-92: 4 Games, 4-0
  • Playoffs: 3 games, 3-0

Magic: First playoff appearance in 1994

  • 1989-1994 (Combined record of 106-249)
  • 89-90: 5 Games, 3-2
  • 90-91: 2 Games, 2-0
  • 91-92: 4 Games, 3-1
  • 92-93: 4 Games, 3-1
  • 93-94: 1 Game, 1-0
  • Playoffs: N/A

Timberwolves: First playoff appearance in 1997

  • 1989-1997 (Combined record of 192-464)
  • 89-90: 2 Games, 2-0
  • 90-91: 2 Games, 2-0
  • 91-92: 2 Games, 2-0
  • 92-93: 2 Games, 2-0
  • 93-94: 0 Games
  • 94-95: 2 Games, 2-0
  • 95-96: 2 Games, 2-0
  • 96-97: 2 Games, 1-1
  • Playoffs: N/A

Raptors: First playoff appearance in 2000

  • 1995-2000 (Combined record of 135-243)
  • 95-96: 4 Games, 3-1
  • 96-97: 4 Games, 3-1
  • 97-98: 4 Games, 4-0
  • 98-99: Retired
  • 99-00: Retired

Grizzlies: First playoff appearance in 2004

  • 1995-2002 (Jordan retired for good in 2002) (Combined record of 101-418)
  • 95-96: 2 Games, 2-0
  • 96-97: 2 Games, 2-0
  • 97-98: 2 Games, 2-0
  • 00-01: 1 Game, 1-0
  • 01-02: 1 Game, 0-1

Michael played in a league that was watered down throughout his career. As the new expansion teams finally got to the playoffs (and many didn't stay long), new teams continued to flood the league. At any given time in his career after 1988, there were at least three teams that had five or less years of experience. However, LeBron also has his fair share of criticism for playing against weak talent.

Did Jordan Play in a Weak League?

Do you think Jordan played in a weak league?

See results
Crying LeBron Meme
Crying LeBron Meme

Does LeBron Play in a Weak Conference?

While Jordan could be said to have played in an overall weak league, many believe LeBron has played in a weak conference for his whole career. The East has been behind the West in nearly every single one of LeBron's seasons in the league. Here is the total number of wins in head-to-head matchups between the two conferences. The East has only won more games in one of James' 14 seasons.

  • 03-04: West with +112 wins.
  • 04-05: West with +62 wins.
  • 05-06: West with +54 wins.
  • 06-07: West with +64 wins.
  • 07-08: West with +66 wins.
  • 08-09: East with +12 wins.
  • 09-10: West with +42 wins.
  • 10-11: West with +72 wins.
  • 11-12: West with +42 wins.
  • 12-13: West with +74 wins.
  • 13-14: West with +118 wins.
  • 14-15: West with +76 wins.
  • 15-16: West with +14 wins.
  • 16-17: West with +42 wins.
  • 17-18 West with +24 wins.
  • 18-19 West with +54 wins.

Although the West has won more games consistently, the East has won eight out of 16 championships since LeBron has entered the league.

Aside from this, LeBron James has also only had two losing season against the Western Conference, in his rookie year when he was 6–22 and in his first season with the Lakers when he was 25–27. He tied the conference 15–15 once, in the 2017–2018 season. Every other season LeBron has a winning record against the West and overall James bolsters a record of 295–193 against the Western Conference for his career. So while LeBron does play in the weaker overall conference, he has never had a hard time beating the West.

LeBron joined the Western Conference when he joined the Lakers in 2018.

Is the East Weaker than the West?

Do you think LeBron plays in the weaker conference on purpose?

See results

Jordan and LeBron Playoffs and Finals

Chris Broussard made a claim before the 2017 Finals that Michael Jordan only faced 9 Hall of Famers during his championship games. LeBron has faced 30 so far. Below is the Hall of Fame opponents listed, including potential future ones that LeBron has played.

Jordan:

  • Magic Johnson
  • James Worthy
  • Clyde Drexler
  • Charles Barkley
  • Gary Payton
  • John Stockton x2
  • Karl Malone x2

Total: 9

LeBron:

  • Tim Duncan x3
  • Tony Parker x3
  • Manu Ginobili x3
  • Dirk Nowitzki
  • Jason Kidd
  • Kevin Durant x3
  • Russell Westbrook
  • James Harden
  • Kawhi Leonard x2
  • Steph Curry x4
  • Klay Thompson x4
  • Draymond Green x4

Total: 30

Of course, not all of these players were in their prime, and overall both played against good competition. While this doesn't cover their playoff roads to get to the Finals, it shows the top talents each player faced on the biggest stage. LeBron has faced two dynasties on seven separate occasions in the Spurs and the Warriors. As for the playoffs, there is a long list of players who MJ and LeBron have faced, many of which were Hall of Famers as well. Below is the list of Hall of Famers each player has played in the playoffs alone, leading to the Finals.

Jordan:

  • Larry Bird 0-2
  • Kevin McHale 0-2
  • Dennis Johnson 0-2
  • Robert Parish 0-2
  • Bill Walton 0-2
  • Isaiah Thomas 1-3
  • Joe Dumars 1-3
  • Adrian Dantley 0-2
  • Dennis Rodman 1-3
  • Patrick Ewing 5-0
  • Charles Barkley 2-0
  • Dominique Wilkins 1-0
  • Alonzo Mourning 3-0
  • Shaquille O'Neil 1-1
  • Dikembe Mutombo 1-0
  • Reggie Miller 1-0

Michael Jordan faced 16 Hall of Famers throughout the playoffs on 39 occasions. He posted a winning record against 6 of the 16, a tied record with 1, and a losing record with 9 of the 16. His total record in the playoffs against Hall of Fame opponents was 17-22, with 10 of his 17 wins coming against Patrick Ewing, Charles Barkley and Alonzo Mourning alone. If you include his Finals appearances, MJ faced 24 Hall of Famers on 48 separate occasions, with a final postseason record of 26-22, or 54%. The problem with this is 20% of his entire postseason wins came against 3 players who never won rings.

LeBron:

  • Ben Wallace: 1-1
  • Chauncey Billups: 2-1
  • Vince Carter 1-0
  • Allen Iverson 1-0
  • Jason Kidd 1-0
  • Ray Allen 2-2
  • Kevin Garnett 3-2
  • Paul Pierce 3-2
  • Dwight Howard 0-1
  • Derrick Rose* 3-0 (These matchups were pre-injury against MVP caliber Rose)
  • Carmelo Anthony 1-0
  • Paul George 3-0
  • Jimmy Butler 2-0
  • Pau Gasol 1-0

LeBron faced 14 current or future Hall of Famers throughout the playoffs, with many players who may end up there that aren't listed here. He faced these 14 on 33 occasions. He posted a winning record against 11 of the 14, tied with 2, and only posted a losing record to Dwight Howard with a single matchup that he lost. His total record against Hall of Fame opponents in the playoffs was 24-9, having no more than 3 wins against a single opponent. If you include Finals appearances, LeBron faced 25 Hall of Famers on 65 occasions, with a final postseason record of 34-31, or 52%. Of those 25 Hall of Famers, 7 of them accounted for 17 of his matchup losses, being the dynasty Spurs and Warriors.

In conclusion, we can see that both players won more than they lost. Jordan never beat the dynasty Celtics in the playoffs and had a 25% winning percentage against the Bad Boys of Detroit. The majority of his postseason wins came against Patrick Ewing, Charles Barkley, and Alonzo Mourning; guys who never won a ring. LeBron however, won against multiple Hall of Famers at a good ratio. He only posted a losing record in the playoffs against one Hall of Famer who he played a single time. Michael Jordan had a losing record in the playoffs against 9 Hall of Famers, 6 of which he never beat in the postseason.

Only 9 out of 48 Hall of Fame opponents Jordan faced were in the Finals, 18%.

32 out of 65 Hall of Fame opponents LeBron James faced were in the Finals, 49%.

LeBron vs. Jordan Postseason

Who had the tougher post season road?

See results

Jordan's Teammates vs. LeBron's Teammates

Aside from who they played, it also matters who they've played with! Many people credit LeBron with the development of the modern age super teams. They say he had to find help in order to win, starting when he left for Miami with Chris Bosh and Dwayne Wade. He continued when he returned to Cleveland to join Kyrie Irving and recruited Kevin Love. So who really played with better supporting players throughout their careers? Below I will list the All Star teammates (while Jordan and LeBron played with them) and Hall of Fame (or future inductees) teammates for each player.

Jordan's All Star Squad:

  • Scottie Pippen (6x)

LeBron's All Star Squad:

  • Zydrunas Ilgauskas
  • Mo Williams
  • Kyrie Irving (2x)
  • Kevin Love
  • Chris Bosh (4x)
  • Dwayne Wade (4x)

Jordan's Hall of Fame Teammates:

  • Scottie Pippen
  • Dennis Rodman

LeBron's Hall of Fame Teammates:

  • Shaquille O'Neil
  • Dwayne Wade
  • Chris Bosh

LeBron had many more All-Stars to help him throughout his career, but the two had similar Hall of Fame talent on their teams, with LeBron only having one more, who was Shaquille O'Neil when he was far past his prime. Still, LeBron has had a far superior lineup and so Jordan holds the advantage.

Cavaliers Championship Ring
Cavaliers Championship Ring

Jordan's 6 Rings vs. LeBron's 3

Michael Jordan has six rings in six attempts. That's clearly better than LeBron's three rings in nine attempts, right? Not necessarily. While Jordan does have a better Finals record and more rings, it doesn't make him automatically better in the postseason. Based on the number of teams admitted to the playoffs, if you are knocked out in the first round, you could be ranked at 16th at worst and ninth at best. That ranking goes up to eighth and fifth during the second round. If eliminated during the Conference Finals, you could be ranked fourth at worst or third at best. Losing in the Finals obviously means you are the second best team in the league. Below is a listing of the rounds LeBron and Jordan were eliminated in during the playoffs.

  • 1st Round: Jordan 3, LeBron 0
  • 2nd Round: Jordan 2, LeBron 3
  • Conference Finals: Jordan 2, LeBron 1
  • Finals: Jordan 0, LeBron 6
  • Wins: Jordan 6, LeBron 3

James has either been the best or second best in nine of his 16 seasons. This means that 56.25% of the time, he would make the Finals and finish the season at first or second. 6.25% of the time, he would rank between third or fourth. He would rank between fifth and eighth 18.75% of the time. He has never ranked at ninth or lower when making the playoffs. James has missed the playoffs 3 times in his career, meaning he finished on a team that was ranked 17th or worse 18.75% of the time.

Jordan was first or second in six of his 15 seasons. He was the best in the league 40% of the time. He was third or fourth 13% of the time; that same number applies to how often he ranked between fifth and eighth. He ranked ninth and lower 20% of the time. Jordan has missed the playoffs 2 times in his career, meaning he finished on a team that was ranked 17th or worse 13.3% of the time.

So while Jordan has a higher percentage of being the absolute best, he also had a higher percentage of being one of the worst teams in the playoffs. LeBron has a much more consistent stream of winning throughout his career, even if it wasn't winning the championship.

Who's the Best Basketball Player Ever?

In conclusion, LeBron James is statistically a better player when it comes to all-around basketball. However, Michael Jordan was a much better scorer. He won more on the biggest stage, but failed often in the playoffs and rarely beat some of his greatest opponents. James played with better teammates than Jordan did. MJ also played in a much weaker league, but LeBron played in a weaker conference for the majority of his career. So who is truly the GOAT?

Who's the GOAT of the NBA?

Who is the Greatest of All Time?

See results

© 2017 Jesse Unk

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment
    • profile image

      Nizzy 

      6 days ago

      I mean at the of the day these are all just options

    • profile image

      Bill 

      3 weeks ago

      MJ played in eras where each team had one star. The only exception was his own team. Meanwhile Lebron played against Tim Duncan, Tony Parker and Ginobli, he played against Howard, Kobe, Nash and Gasol, he played agains the 2012 Thunder superteam. And most of all Curry, Thompson, Green and the SNAKE.

    • profile image

      5 weeks ago

      Even without the analysis, it is a done conversation when one wears the other's number. Jordan has his own number (in creation of his own) whereas James wears his in respect to MJ. To me this discussion is clear cut determined. Dont get me wrong though I like LBJ a lot. But when talking about GOAT, there seems no more discussion there from my point of view. I even prefer Kobe over James for this comparison.

    • profile image

      corey 

      7 weeks ago

      the dude is from OHIO what do yall expect of course he is biased lol

    • profile image

      Nicholas Cook 

      7 weeks ago

      Biased much?

    • profile image

      John 

      8 weeks ago

      Interesting article, I enjoyed it. I feel though is a bit Lebron biased by saying Jordan played in a weaker era when it's quite the opposite. The league was much stronger defensively during Jordan's era. Also, Jordan is 7-2 vs 60+ win teams, 20-7 vs 50+ win teams while Lebron is 3-4 vs 60+ win teams and 10-9 vs 50+ win teams in playoffs. Jordan in the 80s did not have a single all star helping him until the 1989-1990 season when Pippen became an all star.

    • Tim Truzy info4u profile image

      Tim Truzy 

      2 months ago from U.S.A.

      Jordan had better free throws than James, according to your article. James needs to work on free throws. Jordan was trained by Coach Smith, a solid coach; James skipped that.

      Your article says Jordan had less skilled players around him; James went and found the talent as needed. Superb management doesn't make a team better. Basketball is a team sport. It's up to the players. Jordan often said there is no "i" in "team." I don't think that will ever come from James' mouth.

      Jordan left because of personal reasons, not because of financial gain. If he hadn't left, Chicago probably would have had seven rings. Leaving is not leaving. One is less dignified. Selfishness on the part of James does not equal personal tragedy. We shouldn't minimize that.

      James is in the era of selfishness.

    • JesseUnk profile imageAUTHOR

      Jesse Unk 

      2 months ago from Ohio

      Tim,

      I appreciate the kind rebuttal. To be fair to your point of team hopping, LeBron played in an era of super teams and big 3s and had to go to match them, Jordan was gifted the super team because he had solid management. Not to mention he had an 8 year contract so leaving wasnt an option. He also retired and left his team twice, to me leaving is leaving. I do agree he should have worked on his free throws though.

    • Tim Truzy info4u profile image

      Tim Truzy 

      2 months ago from U.S.A.

      This was interesting. I don't think James could handle the Bad Boys of Detroit. They really went after Jordan. Not to mention, James did something Jordan never did: team hopped. Jordan once said he never wanted to go play with people like Bird, just simply beat them. James builds super teams while Jordan made the team he was with better. Apparently, leadership was a minor consideration in your article.

      Jordan was an innovator in the place where he worked; James takes the show to the highest bidder. Truly, Jordan was a much better player than James regardless of any stats.

      By the way, Jordan credits Coach Dean Smith for emphasizing free throws at UNC- Chapel Hill, I wonder if James had spent more time working with people like Coach K. during those Olympic Games, would his free throw percentage had improved? I wonder if James had stepped up on defense, could he had handled Tim Duncan and that incredible Spurs dynasty. I'm not sure. But James said the Spurs was the toughest defensive team he played against. Coach Pop was no joke. I enjoyed your well written piece, living through all of these changes in the NBA.

    • profile image

      DJ 

      2 months ago

      WTF kind of article takes a trash ESPN stat and use it to argue Lebron is more clutch? Who in their right mind would ever take Lebron to take the final shot over Jordan? WHAT?

    • profile image

      Jimmy L. 

      2 months ago

      One other point, look at the HOFers in the Finals, Lebron is 10-20 against these guys. Plus he has losing records against all but Westbrook and Harden (1-0) and Kawhi (1-1). I would even be willing to take away Lebron's first Finals in 2007 when he was evidently outmatched. Lebron is still 10-17 against HOFers. Lebron in his prime could not hold a candle to MJ. Not to mention, Klay and Draymond are by no means shoe-ins for the HOF, nor are Rose or Billups. There are similar contemporaries in Jordan's era to these guys.

      Rose = young Ron Harper or Penny,

      Billups = Kevin Johnson, Tim Hardaway or Mark Price

      Klay and Butler = Glen Rice, Eddie Jones or Steve Smith

      Draymond = Well, he is unique and hard to truly compare to others, but similarity scores would consider Webber and Cliff Robinson to be good comparisons.

      You also failed to mention, HOFers MJ faced in Eastern Conference like Divac (Lakers and Hornets), Moncrieff (Bucks), Chris Mullins (Pacers) and Mo Cheeks (Knicks) or potential HOFers that Lebron has played with Kevin Love and Kyrie Irving.

    • profile image

      Jimmy L 

      2 months ago

      The rules changes are a major difference, but the biggest thing I see from your comparisons is you taking others (including ESPN's faulty "clutch" stat) and take them at face value instead of reviewing the actual numbers yourself contextually. Lebron's 34% 3PT percentage is slightly better than MJ's (33%), but he plays when the avg. is 35% whereas MJ played when it was 33%. So, Lebron is slightly worse contextually than Jordan. Lebron is in no way a better "shooter" than Jordan since Lebron regularly takes more than 1/3 of his shots within 3ft. I do not knock Lebron for taking high percentage shots, but you can say that he only exceeds MJ's shooting percentage by 0.7%, while converting so many dunks and layups. You would not say Shaq is a better shooter than Lebron since he has a better FG% while taking so many more shots within 3 ft. I would not expect you to. You also have to look at when they played to understand the context rebounds by Lebron in this era compared to Jordan in the 80s and 90s. Westbrook averages 7.1 rebounds a game without worry for repercussions in the paint, slightly less than that of Lebron at 7.4.

      Now, Lebron is not nearly the defensive stopper that MJ was. Lebron regularly rests on defense, when MJ was almost always one of the best defender in the league. The situation is not even close.

      Statistically, Lebron only leads MJ in three of the eight traditional statistics, 3PT% rebounds and assists. So, how is Lebron "statistically" a better player? As stated above, the 3PT% contextually by their era is in favor of MJ and the FG% is less than 1% difference. That is a negligible delta. Lebron is the better passer and is a productive rebounder, but isn't even close on FT% and points. The steals are a bit better for MJ and 50% greater than that for Lebron, the blocks are marginally better, so can look at it the same as FG% being negligibly different.

      Finally, this whole idea that Lebron plays in a stronger league and has been part of the "second best team" regularly since he is losing in the Finals is ridiculous. They changed the playoff seeding and structure because of the strength of the Western Conference in the late 2000s to early 2010s. Regularly, the top two teams in the NBA played each other before the conference finals (e.g. 2006 Mavs and Spurs). Look at the 2007 (Spurs/Suns), 2014 (Spurs/Thunder), 2017 (Warriors/Spurs) and 2018 (Warriors/Rockets) Western Conference finals, the better teams were those facing off in the Western Conference. Lebron rarely faced off against difficult Eastern Conference opponents. Lebron may have faced more great dynasties in the Finals, but that is because the Bulls WERE the dynasty.

    • profile image

      Scott L Siegel 

      2 months ago

      One major factor you conveniently left out is that the rules of the NBA have changed drastically. When MJ played, you could practically punch a player in the face and not get a foul call. Nowadays, you get called for touching another player with your fingertip. That makes a huge difference in how agressive you can be.

    • JesseUnk profile imageAUTHOR

      Jesse Unk 

      2 months ago from Ohio

      William,

      Feel free! I appreciate you sharing.

    • profile image

      Willian Wallace 

      2 months ago

      good night friend, i'm from brazil and i loved your article, i would like to know if you give me permission to translate this content and spread only a section on my twitter, is there a problem? I will give you the credits

    • profile image

      Cele 

      2 months ago

      Biased doesn't even begin to describe what this article is. Example, u said and I quote

      "Jordan won more games and thus has a greater overall record in the Finals. On an individual performance level, however, LeBron excels in more categories than Jordan in both their regular-season careers and Finals." But when I checked the stat sheet you put up as sample, Jordan beats LeBron 6-3 in the categories. How does this reflect that LeBron excel in more categories.

      Word of advice if you feel LeBron is better than Jordan that's fine by me but don't put up stats and then quote the opposite.

      You said LeBron is a better all round player and to me that is not true. I know you say that because LeBron averages more rebound and assist but that doesn't make him a better all round player. Remember assist, pts and offensive rebounds all make up a player's offense while blocks, steals and defensive rebound makes up a player's defense. Jordan is a better offensively and defensively hence is better all round play than LeBron.

      I can go on and on about why your article is biased but I don't think it will change your opinion (which you have a right to) so I will say enjoy your opinion but don't throw it to the masses like it's facts.

    • JesseUnk profile imageAUTHOR

      Jesse Unk 

      3 months ago from Ohio

      Nick,

      You lost me when you said Jordan didn't have a superteam.

    • profile image

      Nick 

      3 months ago

      This article is so bias. Even the polls beg to differ. Jordan is the G.O.A.T. Jordan didn't need a superteam to win championships, while Lebron desperately needed them to win a championship. And the way Jordan just made his opponents look silly, will forever be unmatched by any player. Lebron can and will never be Jordan, no matter how he finishes his career. Just look at your polls. J.O.R.D.A.N. is the best. It's not even a close argument to put Lebum in the same sentence as Jordan. It's insulting.

    • profile image

      Rob 

      3 months ago

      Vlade Divac is in the hall of fame. He played with magic and worthy. Michael faced 5 hall of famers in the celtics. Bird, Mchale, Johnson, Walton, Parish. Lebron pooped the bed in 2011. Michael would never let jason terry out score him or anyone out score him for an entire series. In one year MJ won the steals title, dunk title, mvp, scoring title, dpoy title and all star game mvp. Hes the better all around player. LBJ has longevity stats. He hasn't made a defensive first team in how long? Also take into account this era allows players to play a lot longer.

    • JesseUnk profile imageAUTHOR

      Jesse Unk 

      3 months ago from Ohio

      Charlie,

      The same could be said for LeBron in 2015 averaging a triple double in the finals without Kyrie or Love, or scoring 51/8/8 in 2018 when they lost. People ignore all kinds of things when downplaying LeBron's contributions. This article is about simply making the argument that Jordan isnt as untouchable as people make him out to be.

    • profile image

      Charlie 

      3 months ago

      Jordan did lose to the Celtics , but he posted 49 and 63 against them , the bulls had Jordan and sticks with him ..your stats show him losing, but they don't put the series in context , 8th vs 1st seed, misses almost the entire season , Celtics had a great roster and Jordan forced overtime . .. numbers are nothing if not placed into context.. this is own example of many...

    • profile image

      Stanley Daniel 

      3 months ago

      Yes Lebron is GOAT but MJ is GOD

    • JesseUnk profile imageAUTHOR

      Jesse Unk 

      3 months ago from Ohio

      Bell31,

      I actually have Bill sitting 8th all time. The rings are important, but you also have to look at the competition faced. If Jordan had faced the dynasty Spurs and Warriors 7 times would he have a perfect record? I dont think so. History shows he struggled with teams that boasted big 3s. And he never faces a big 4 besides the Celtics, who swept him twice.

    • profile image

      Bell31 

      3 months ago

      Interesting piece Jesse and some valid points, although I get the sense that you might get a bit lost in the details of the stats --- I think it's especially tricky comparing stats from different eras without doing an incredibly extensive analysis of all stats across eras. However, when it comes to LBJ and MJ, big picture, one has 6 titles and one has 3 titles, and given bball is such an individualist game, it's hard to go past that, especially as many of their overall stats (esp PER) are so similar (I realise the rejoinder might be the Bill Russell argument, but I don't think you even have him in your top 10 players).

    • JesseUnk profile imageAUTHOR

      Jesse Unk 

      4 months ago from Ohio

      Felix,

      I can certainly start taking a look at it! Right now i have a few other articles in the works, but i will get back to that. I plan on expanding this article in the near future!

    • profile image

      Felix 

      4 months ago

      I would like to see an adjustment that is use in baseball taking in consideration the baseball park. I'd like to see that adjustment in terms of defense and offense between Jordan time and Lebron time. It was difficult to score 100 in those days, now it is usual to see team scoring 100 plus. Lebron scoring would be lower and Jordan scoring would be higher, the same would apply for shooting %...Can you make that analisys?

    • profile image

      Christian Harmon 

      4 months ago

      PER takes into account every major statistic in basketball. Scoring, rebounding, steals, assists, etc... Jordan not only has a higher rating than LeBron for his career, but his playoff PER creates and even wider gap between him and LeBron. Jordan’s PER shows he was a better all-around player. Also, LeBron has never made a game tying or go ahead shot to clinch a game, while facing elimination, or even in the NBA finals in the last 24 seconds of a game. Jordan is 10-17.

    • profile image

      David 

      4 months ago

      Lebron has actually beat most of the hall of famers in the playoffs jordan didnt

    • profile image

      Hu 

      5 months ago

      look do not get me wrong but lebron james is the goat,in all the finals in which he appeared in which are 9 most of them the reason why he lost was because he was unevenly matched with teams.2007 was going against a superteam that were spurs,mavericks it was his first year,they were still learning to get along.And in the Warriors matchup it was unfair

    • profile image

      Kristaps 

      5 months ago

      Jordan won the chip with a 55 win team. LeBron went to the finals with 20 win teams

    • profile image

      TRON 

      6 months ago

      Simple fact Lebron has had to recruit and build his team full of allstars to win a ring MJ won six with 1 allstar teammate. not to mention you saying todays allstars dont compare with those of mj 's era (witch I agree with) sounds like MJ played in a much more talented leage

    • JesseUnk profile imageAUTHOR

      Jesse Unk 

      6 months ago from Ohio

      Tron,

      The idea that you think Pippen and Hakeem are equal to Love and Kyrie or just AD is astounding. Wade is the only teammate LeBron has had within their range of talent. Let alone to say both of them would have been similar to what LeBron has had.

    • profile image

      TRON 

      6 months ago

      Can U imagine Jordan Pippen and lets say Ewing or Hakeem on the same team the way Lebron has had it the last 10 yrs they wouldnt lose

    • profile image

      Ddfsg 

      6 months ago

      Lebron is the greatest player of all time.

    • profile image

      I love this debate 

      7 months ago

      It’s going to come down to how Lebron does in the postseason from now until he retires. No more rings and that’s a pretty rough argument. If he gets one or more it gets harder to debate.

    • JesseUnk profile imageAUTHOR

      Jesse Unk 

      7 months ago from Ohio

      Christmas,

      By your same logic LeBron is building a legacy just as big, if not bigger, with his own shoe line, production company, and school for underprivileged kids. And I wouldnt day Jordan owning a team helps, because hes managed it terribly since he took over.

      Merry Christmas!

    • profile image

      Up early on Christmas 

      7 months ago

      I can't believe this is still being debated. I grew up a Jordan fan so you know where my vote lies. i will say that Jordan's legacy and continued relevance to the game by him being an owner makes it very difficult for Lebron to surpass hi. Koby retied and began faded out of this debate immediately. Michael changed the game with his play on the court and his branding of the Jordan name. A LEGEND is a bigger than life story. With Jordan's well deserved legendary status, it is very unlikely that the Easter bunny will ever surpass Santa Claus. Merry Christmas everyone. Oh, and for all Kobe fans, remember, there are tons of kids who still believe in the tooth fairly :)

    • profile image

      Danaman25 

      8 months ago

      Jesse Unk.... I am not comparing Phil Jackson to Eric Spoelstra. There is a clear gap in their legendary status at this time. My only point is with regards to playing with a legendary coaches. Jordan's ability to play at a high level had nothing to do with Phil Jackson. Jackson can take praise for creating the triangle offence, which helped Jordan. The 'Jordan Rules' was something which the triangle offence broke down. But again, this has nothing to do with Jordan's ability. The idea that LeBron is self taught and Jordan had great coaches is an excuse to try and make out that LeBron is superior. That is far from true

    • JesseUnk profile imageAUTHOR

      Jesse Unk 

      8 months ago from Ohio

      Youre comparing Phil Jackson to Eric Spoelstra. Had Spoelstra won after LeBron, the way Jackson did when he went on to acquire 11 rings, people would absolutely say Spoelstra had great coaches. LeBron has never played for an elite coach early or late in their career. Phil Jackson created an offense that changed the game. Whether he was known at the time or not doesn't matter. That would be like saying Bill Belichick isn't a great coach because he didn't do anything before Brady and has never not had Brady playing. He is who history shows he is, whether it was known at the time or not.

    • profile image

      Danaman25 

      8 months ago

      Jesse Unk....He excelled but you cannot call him a legend or a great coach at that time. He was still unproven. Erik Spoelstra has won titles with Lebron, yet no one calls him a legend after winning his two titles. They say Lebron won it for him (with Wade and Bosh). Yet like, Jordan, Lebron had no title until going meeting up with the Erik Spoelstra.

      i think Jackson knew he had a winning formula and a one in a life time chance of working with Jordan. Pippen had a big part to play it all though, but eve though he excelled, using the excuse of a legendary coach cannot apply when Jordan won his titles. Jackson was nobody as a coach at that time

    • JesseUnk profile imageAUTHOR

      Jesse Unk 

      8 months ago from Ohio

      Danaman,

      Just because he hadn't made a name for himself yet doesn't mean he wasn't a good coach. He excelled whenever he had talent in his day.

    • profile image

      Danaman25 

      8 months ago

      @Mitch Ross...Jordan had a great coach? Not at the time. Phil Jackson did not win nothing until he join Chicago. He was a legend by the time he went to LA, but he won nothing pre-Jordan. Jordan did not win pre-Jackson either, but Jordan's level of play was already at a high level. His peers already regarded him as better than them, but they knew that they had the better team. He just needed other players to step up (Pippen), and he benefitted from Jackson's philosophy.

    • profile image

      Mitch Ross 

      8 months ago

      Lebron is basically self taught; Jordan had great coaches!

    • profile image

      SammyMitch 

      13 months ago

      Sorry, but I’m lost on the first breakdown of “Le Bron vs Michael Jordan Stats”. Even if I take those stats at face value (which I won’t), I still see Jordan at minimum ahead in 5 categories as opposed to 4, and then I’m giving the blocks to Jordan (a guy who’s 6 foot 6 and averaging the same number of blocks per game as a guy who’s 6 foot 8 is superior in that category, so if we have to split them they’re going to Jordan.

      I’ve got a particular gripe with the stat of “Rebounds” though. Of all those stats, the one that can be most easily padded are “Defensive Rebounds”. C’mon let’s face it, a massive proportion of “Defensive” rebounds are just collecting the ball in free space while the opposing team are already down the other end setting up their defence. If we look at “Offensive” Rebounds, which are always contested, Jordan is substantially ahead with 1.6 vs 1.2 per game. So here we have a 6-6 guy who is taking down more “Offensive” Rebounds than a guy who’s 6-8. I’m giving Rebounds as a stat to Jordan!!

      And why is it anyway that the only stats that anyone seems to focus on in these assessments are the first three, after which they always drift off into the same vague statement of “Le Bron is clearly a better all round player”. All around what?? There’s only two ends of the court and Jordan blocks more, he steals more, he scores more, he rebounds offensively more. Are we really saying that because of those flimsy Assists and Defensive Rebound stats that James is a better all round player??!!

    • JesseUnk profile imageAUTHOR

      Jesse Unk 

      13 months ago from Ohio

      AJ,

      Jordan had Scottie and Horace every time he faced the Pistons and had Charles Oakley the first time they met. You can say he had no help with Boston, but he should have at least been winning a game here or there. LeBron was missing the playoffs when he had no teammates and was 18 years old. He was leading his cast of bad teammates to the Finals at age 22 where he beat the recent Champion Pistons singlehandedly.

    • profile image

      AJ 

      13 months ago

      Who did Jordan have on his team against the Celtics and Pistons dynastys the first couple of years?? I'll answer....a bunch of coke heads. For as good as you say Lebron makes his teams better, Lebron didn't even make the playoffs till his 3rd year!

    • JesseUnk profile imageAUTHOR

      Jesse Unk 

      14 months ago from Ohio

      Rickgrimes,

      You mean big games where he leads in go ahead shots made and averaged a triple double in the finals? Or games where he led both teams in all statistical categories?

    • profile image

      Rickgrimes 

      14 months ago

      Super biased analysis ill ever read..way off to compare with mj, in mj era lebron will be an average player only like d'wilkins..period..lebron aint no clutch especially in the big games..

    • JesseUnk profile imageAUTHOR

      Jesse Unk 

      14 months ago from Ohio

      John,

      I do love the Mamba! I have Shaq above him though. Im not sure he has 5 rings without him.

    • profile image

      John Skulavik 

      14 months ago

      I like Kobe Bryant... watched them all from Baylor to Lebron... I think physically and mentally Bryant is the GOAT.

    • JesseUnk profile imageAUTHOR

      Jesse Unk 

      22 months ago from Ohio

      The Watcher, not only did i list all the stats you just said, but i even said jordan was better in all those areas. You cant argue jordan would end things when his stats drop in multiple areas in game 7s and his record in elimination games is a losing one. Analytics tell the story better than your memory. Stats dont lie. Also, learn to read. I never said Jordan had a better team. My article literally says he had a less impressive lineup on his side.

    • profile image

      The Watcher 

      22 months ago

      I still had this window open when I went back to my iPad tonight and I glanced down to what you wrote. Did you just infer that Durant is better than Jordan? The dude who choked away a 3-1 lead and then went to play for the team who he choked it away against? Are you out of your f***ing mind? Lol I’m not mad, really... it’s just pretty absurd and tells me you didn’t watch the NBA in those days. Let me tell you something, son... replace Durant with Jordan and the Warriors aren’t going to the Finals that year. Jordan puts his foot on their neck and ends that sucka! :) C’mon, man! Get real!

    • profile image

      The Watcher 

      22 months ago

      I’ve seen both dudes play. Jordan was more dominant. Period. You can try and skew the argument in LBJ’s favor all you want. During the last five minutes of ball games, I’ve seen LBJ disappear in ways that MJ never did. Period. Case in point... 2010 Playoffs against the Celtics, 2011 Finals against the Mavs, 2013 Finals against the Spurs in Game 6 where he turned the ball over 3 times in the final 5 minutes of the game to hand the Spurs the trophy before they chocked it away by missing free throws and not getting a key rebound (why wasn’t Duncan on the floor? I’ll never know) - anyway, check the tape. And here are some facts... Grant/Pippen/Rodman combined for 10 All-Star appearances. Love/Irving/Wade/Bosh have 33.... so no, LBJ did not have less help than MJ. Want some more facts? I knew that you would! MJ - 6 Championships to LBJ’s 3, Finals MVPs 6 to 3, League MVPs 5 to 4, scoring titles 10 to 1, Defensive Player of the Year 1 to 0, steals titles 3 to 0. I mean, you can’t argue it away... Jordan was better. On top of all that, his prime efficiency stats were also better. Period. Done and done. Give it up, millennials! Lol

    • JesseUnk profile imageAUTHOR

      Jesse Unk 

      2 years ago from Ohio

      Alphadogg I'd read my other article on MJ. You'd be surprised how few quality opponents Jordan faced and beat. His record against hall of fame players is abysmal. Most of his wins against HOFers were compiled against Barkley and Ewing, the ringless wonders. He rarely beat a HOF opponent in their prime. Lebron hasn't played in as physical of a league, but the athleticism of this league is far beyond what Jordan faced. If KD had played in Jordan's era we wouldn't even be talking about MJ as the GOAT. They'd be answerless for players like him.

    • profile image

      Alphadogg16 

      2 years ago

      After watching LBJ lose yet another NBA Finals, and this hub popped up again, I thought Id strengthen my argument on MJ. The evolution of today's game is set up for LBJ to dominate. If MJ played in today's game, he would still dominate. MJ never had the spacing LBJ has, 3 point shooters weren't as good or abundant as they are now, defense is basically outlawed, no hand checking, physicality is rarely allowed, with LBJ's size, speed and athleticism he's virtually unstoppable. MJ never had stretch 4 & 5's to pull the rim protector away from the basket leaving the lane open to do as he pleased, and MJ never had the offensive fire power LBJ has had along side him in Kyrie, Wade, Love, Bosh. The best MJ had was Pippen, who initially was a defensive stopper, his offensive was slowly developed. The 8 straight finals appearances are grossly over rated, the eastern conference has been like the CBA since the fall of the Celtics and D Rose led Bulls, LBJ doesn't even face a real team until he gets to the finals....and hence why the 3-6 record. LBJ is the most physically gifted player ever....but not even close to being the GOAT.

    • JesseUnk profile imageAUTHOR

      Jesse Unk 

      2 years ago from Ohio

      Thanks Jim! I'm glad you enjoyed it. I'd appreciate it if you shared it to some of your Jordan and Lebron loving friends!

    • profile image

      Jim Sippel 

      2 years ago

      Great article and awesome stastical analysis of both players and the league. I've been wanting to this myself for sometime glad you beat me to it.

    • JesseUnk profile imageAUTHOR

      Jesse Unk 

      2 years ago from Ohio

      Jeffrey, the facts are certainly revealing when you look at numbers and not nostalgia.

    • profile image

      Jeffrey 

      2 years ago

      I didnt realize Jordan was 1-5 against the Celtics and Pistons. People always talk about how he had to play those great guys, and he never even won! He was beating up Patrick Ewing and Barkley who arent even top 20 guys! Good article!

    • JesseUnk profile imageAUTHOR

      Jesse Unk 

      2 years ago from Ohio

      Anytime Kid. I'll be updating the article this week to include lebrons stats from this past season and a few more things I've found since the past few weeks.

    • profile image

      Kid 

      2 years ago

      Thank you now I have knowlegde

    • JesseUnk profile imageAUTHOR

      Jesse Unk 

      3 years ago from Ohio

      I wouldn't say this is LeBron biased at all. In fact most of the stats favor him. The only pro LeBron arguments are the 2nd level wins, overall stats, and competition. Everything else points to Jordan or a stalemate.

    • profile image

      Nice article, but Lebron biased 

      3 years ago

      Are you kidding me. MJ played with 1 all star and won 6 titles. Lebron keeps complaining he needs more help and that his team is top heavy as bleep. MJ never did any recruiting or complaining, imagine if he did what Lebron does, they would have won every year getting all the best players and forcing management to cater to his every thought or desire.

    • JesseUnk profile imageAUTHOR

      Jesse Unk 

      3 years ago from Ohio

      You're correct in that Horace Grant isn't in the Hall of Fame yet, but he most likely will be at some point similar to many of the players LeBron played with. Absolutely not a first ballot, but will probably join at some point in his career. I'd also disagree with your statement that LeBron lacks a killer instinct. His first Finals appearance he was triple teamed by a Spurs team that knew he had no help. He absolutely choked twice in Miami, but since he carried a depleted Cavs team to 6 his first year back in Cleveland, brought them back from a 3-1 deficit for a ring, and averaged a triple double last season. Kobe was known for Killer instinct, and even he lost twice. I think winning matters at all levels of the game. Like I stated above, if only rings mattered the greatest ever would be Bill Russell.

    • Alphadogg16 profile image

      Kevin W 

      3 years ago from Texas

      While this is a pretty good analysis and growing up in Chicago and being a Bulls fan since before MJ, When Artis Gilmore and Orlando Woolridge were the Alphas, my opinion might be a little biased. I agree that Lebron is an all around better player, makes the players around him better, however since when do moral victories count? winning more in the playoffs versus winning in the Finals, when it counts the most. I think MJ is the Goat simply because of his heart, his will to win, that "Killer intinct", something Lebron does not have/never had. Their were rules made up to stop MJ, hand checking, manhandling was perfectly legal and he was mugged on the court pretty much every night. Lebron has had much more talent around him in Miami and this second stint with Cleveland and I'm pretty sure Horace Grant is not in the Hall of Fame.

    • profile image

      Ron Unk 

      3 years ago

      Good analysis

    working

    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, howtheyplay.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://maven.io/company/pages/privacy

    Show Details
    Necessary
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Features
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Marketing
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Statistics
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
    ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)