Updated date:

Dusty Baker: Is Nats' Skipper a Future Hall of Famer?

John Winkelheimer has been an online sports writer for over three years. His articles often focus on athletes and team management.

Washington Nationals manager Dusty Baker.

Washington Nationals manager Dusty Baker.

No, he hasn't won a World Series yet. And he is sometimes ridiculed for his unusual managerial style and for going against the saberstat-driven grain.

But Dusty Baker is still a future Hall of Famer. The Washington Nationals' skipper has compiled his way to greatness, winning over 1,800 games for four teams over 22 seasons.

That raw win total itself is astonishing—only 16 of the nearly 700 men to ever captain a team have won that many games, and 12 of them are in the Hall of Fame. The other three not named Mr. Baker have their reasons for exclusion too; Bruce Bochy is still active and is a sure-fire Cooperstowner when he retires, Gene Mauch finished with a losing record and only two first-place finishes, and Lou Piniella is biding his time until eventual enshrinement, himself a Dusty Baker-lite (but with a World Series win under his belt).

And Baker, a three-time Manager of the Year recipient, is quickly moving up the all-time rankings—he is 14th right now, and with a good 2018 will surpass the legendary Casey Stengel for 11th place.

But being around a long enough time to reach high statistical totals is not, on its own, enough to establish greatness—look, for example, at Gene Mauch. A manager leading a bunch of winning, but mediocre, third-place teams is far different than one with a pedigree of first-place excellence.

With six first-place finishes, and likely a seventh in 2017, Baker has that pedigree. He has led each team he's managed to at least one finish atop the division, and skippered clubs to 90 or more wins—the hallmark of a worthwhile season—nine times, with number ten on the way this year. In contrast, Hall of Famer Sparky Anderson spent 26 years managing, and he had only seven first-place finishes.

Of course, regular season performance is all well-and-good, but its the postseason where it counts. Well, Dusty Baker has led eight clubs to the postseason and won over 20 games there. That's a milestone reached by only 25 other skippers—and nearly three-quarters of the inactive managers among those ranks are in the Hall.

Then there's the elephant in the room—the lack of World Series rings. Baker has never led a squad to a championship victory, and that is oft-blamed on incompetence or lack of acumen or mismanagement of talent.

But managerial prowess does not dissipate suddenly in the playoffs. Someone without a great baseball mind could not lead so many teams to not just winning seasons, but first-place finishes and postseason appearances. Chalk the lack of championships up to rotten luck, perhaps, but not managerial incompetence.

And his playing career deserves mention, if one wishes to make a hybrid case for Baker—he was a very good player and a is a very good manager, one might say, and that rare combination itself establishes greatness.

Baker won multiple Silver Sluggers and earned numerous All-Star selections. And he collected a Gold Glove and won the National League Championship Series MVP honor in 1977. He combined power and speed to reach nearly 2,000 hits and over 1,000 RBI in a career that spanned two decades. He was a stalwart on the field as well as one directing it.

Baker doesn't have the skein of World Series victories of a Joe Torre or the standout run of 14-straight divisional titles of a Bobby Cox, but he does stand out. A combination of consistent positive output punctuated by multiple flashes of sheer greatness puts him among a unique pantheon of baseball managers.

And it will put him in the Hall of Fame.

© 2017 John Winkelheimer

Comments

CJ Kelly from the PNW on August 23, 2017:

Not having a World Series victory (although he has one as a Dodger in '81) is a strike against him, in my opinion. Gene Mauch had 1900 wins, would you put him in the HoF?

Both Scioscia and Francona have better winning percentages and rings.

I'm not necessarily against putting him in there, he's a good baseball man and well liked. But I tend to lean towards quality over quantity when it comes to Hall of Fame candidates.

Angel Guzman from Joliet, Illinois on August 23, 2017:

Sure, why the hell not. The man has done a great job on the field playing and managing. I will be forever grateful his work in Chicago and sad it ended in such a bad note. Hall of Fame!

Related Stories

this-only-happened-six-times-in-major-league-baseball-between-1940-1993

The Five MLB Seasons Since 1940 With No Hall of Fame Debuts

Hundreds of players step foot onto a major league baseball field for the first time every season, and among those debuts are a handful of stars, a lot of duds, and—in most cases—at least a Hall of Famer or two. But what about those seasons which don’t see a Hall of Fame player making his debut?

baseball-a-changing-landscape

Strike Three: Baseball Is Dead

Baseball has declined in popularity, and that will have a long-lasting effect on the culture at large. Years from now, a young child will ask, "Grandpa, what was baseball?"