This is my ninth ACC Basketball Preview for Hubpages. My degree is in literature and education and I've always enjoyed ACC basketball.
The ACC is coming off one of its worst NCAA Tournament performances in decades, and, while the conference does add 18 of the top 100 high school recruits in the country, only six rank among the top 60 prospects, which represents a significant downturn in recruiting overall. Multiple teams were clinging to hope that they would be able to fill apparent holes in their rotations through what was a busy transfer market, but that process was shockingly disappointing for the conference as well. This has been the busiest offseason in the history of college basketball; transfers have been granted a one-time waiver for immediate eligibility for the upcoming season, while another rule granting everyone that played last season an additional year of eligibility meant that productive graduating seniors were being looked at in much the same way as underclassmen that are draft prospects. The NBA Draft was still a huge factor as well, and more players are leaving early for non-guaranteed opportunities overseas and in the G League every year. Free agency for over 350 Division I basketball programs has essentially come to an end, and at this point the ACC appears to be in line for six or at most seven NCAA Tournament berths next March.
*This article will be updated as personnel changes unfold. The Miami section will finally be expanded when Jalen Duren makes his decision about next season.
Duke Blue Devils
2020-2021: 13-11, 9-9 in the ACC (10th)
Departures: Matthew Hurt (18.3 ppg., 6.2 rpg., 44.4% 3pt.) and DJ Steward (13.0 ppg., 3.9 rpg.) entered the NBA Draft; Jordan Goldwire (5.8 ppg., 4.0 apg., 2.3 spg.) transferred to Oklahoma, Jaemyn Brakefield transferred to Ole Miss, Henry Coleman transferred to Texas A&M, and Patrick Tape transferred to San Francisco
Major Additions: 6-9 top 5 recruit Paul Banchero, 6-7 top 15 recruit AJ Griffin, 6-5 top 20 recruit Trevor Keels, 6-9 Marquette transfer Theo John, and 6-2 top 100 recruit Jaylen Blakes
Preseason Projection: 1st in the ACC; Elite Eight
Duke entered last season with a roster that was going to be heavily dependent on freshmen, a common occurrence for teams that are popular among one and done players. Unfortunately, without preseason practice time, scrimmages, and games to help acclimate those young players, particularly the guards, last year was a very bad time to be in that position. The young roster never really caught up, particularly at the defensive end of the court, and Duke missed the NCAA Tournament for the first time since 1995 and for the first time since 1983 with a healthy Mike Krzyzewski. The Blue Devils have loaded up once more with the arrival of three top 20 prospects, but the outcome should be very different with a complete offseason.
As much as the Blue Devils struggled overall last season, offensive efficiency was still a strength, as the team finished 49th in the country in field goal percentage and 40th in assist to turnover ratio. That ball control success was largely due to the since departed Jordan Goldwire, but point guard play could actually improve with sophomore Jeremy Roach (8.7 ppg.), a five star recruit a year ago, a likely candidate to be the team’s most improved player with his first complete offseason. After jockeying for playing time with fellow freshman DJ Steward last season, Roach will have every opportunity to display the floor leadership he was touted for coming out of high school. It didn’t help the Blue Devils that 6-6 junior Wendell Moore, another former 5 star prospect, got off to a nightmarish start as a sophomore. He did seem to figure things out down the stretch, however, and he effectively stuffed the stat sheet at both ends of the floor over the team's last 12 games with 11.8 points, 5.6 rebounds, 3.8 assists, and 1.5 steals per game while shooting a respectable 49.1% from the field. If Moore can relax and build on those numbers, he could finally find his way to the NBA next year. A third five star recruit, Trevor Keels, may not start as a freshman but will have a major role. Keels is a strong and physical 6-5 guard that can score inside and out; he may turn out to be the best perimeter shooter on the team, and he’s a capable passer that will help keep the ball moving as a secondary facilitator. Joey Baker, a 6-7 former top 40 recruit, returns to provide depth, and theoretically perimeter shooting, on the wings. After shooting poorly last season (31.4% 3pt.), Baker will need a strong junior year to avoid an Alex O’Connell career path. Krzyzewski was able to add top 100 recruit Jaylen Blakes in the spring to serve as backup point guard. Blakes should help replace Goldwire’s competitiveness defensively, although he looks to score more often than Goldwire and likely won’t be as efficient with the basketball as a freshman.
No one seemed to have been hurt more by the lack of an offseason than Mark Williams, a 7-0 five star recruit who was barely able to get on the court until the midseason departure of Jalen Johnson. However, Williams got comfortable and began to assert himself quickly once he was given the opportunity, and with all of the conference's offseason turmoil he will be the most promising young post player remaining in the ACC after averaging 16.7 points, 7.8 rebounds, and 1.7 blocks over the team’s last six games. He should build on that success as he continues to add weight, and his length, athleticism, and motor should eventually land him in the NBA. The most highly regarded prospect on the team will be Paolo Banchero, a 6-9 power forward considered the number two recruit in the class. Banchero has the potential to do everything well; while he won't be as dangerous of a perimeter shooter as Matthew Hurt as a freshman, he should do more to help offensive efficiency with his passing and he will be a major upgrade on the boards. The third likely member of the starting frontcourt, AJ Griffin, is a top 15 recruit in his own right, making a total of six five star recruits on the roster; that number is more imposing this year because it is equal to the total for the rest of the conference combined. Griffin's a physically explosive 6-7 player that should make good things happen at both ends of the floor, and he has the potential to quickly become a high draft pick as well. Theo John, a 6-9 transfer that played under Steve Wojciechowski at Marquette (8.0 ppg., 5.0 rpg., 1.5 bpg.), will give the Blue Devils experienced size and additional rim protection off the bench. John’s addition was particularly interesting because it essentially pushed Henry Coleman, a player with a higher ceiling that may be a better player as early as this year, out the door and into the transfer portal.
Defense was the real issue for the Blue Devils a year ago; organization at that end of the floor was so much of a problem that Krzyzewski had to switch to a zone at times to simplify responsibilities for his young roster. Duke finished a hard to imagine 265th in field goal percentage defense and 276th in 3pt. percentage defense, and the move to a zone contributed to a very average performance on the boards (130th in rebounding margin). Goldwire’s departure will hurt defensive ball pressure, but overall this team will be larger and more athletic, and a complete offseason will provide more time to become a cohesive unit. The Blue Devils did manage to finish 34th in blocks per game last season, and the frontcourt additions, along with the continued improvement of Mark Williams, should put them into the top ten nationally this year. With an overwhelming amount of largely unselfish talent, offensive efficiency should again be a strength, although perimeter shooting will be a major unknown heading into the season. This has been announced as Mike Krzyzewski's last season as head coach. Although his young final roster will likely see growing pains, he will have one of the most talented teams in the country with as many as six players that could be in the NBA as early as next year. While Duke isn't going to be the favorite nationally, there will be a very real chance for Krzyzewski to go out on top.
North Carolina Tar Heels
2020-2021: 18-11, 10-6 in the ACC (6th); lost to Wisconsin in the 1st round of the NCAA Tournament
Departures: Day’Ron Sharpe (9.5 ppg., 7.6 rpg.) entered the NBA Draft; Walker Kessler (4.4 ppg., 3.2 rpg.) transferred to Auburn, Garrison Brooks (10.2 ppg., 6.9 rpg.) transferred to Mississippi St., and Walker Miller transferred to Monmouth; Sterling Manley entered the transfer portal
Major Additions: 6-11 Marquette transfer Dawson Garcia, 6-8 Virginia transfer Justin McCoy, 6-7 top 70 recruit Dontrez Styles, 6-9 Oklahoma transfer Brady Manek, and 6-4 top 70 recruit D’Marco Dunn
Preseason Projection: 2nd in the ACC; Elite Eight
Roy Williams’ final Tar Heels squad was heavily dependent on freshmen, and it was the worst possible time for that to be true due to the effects of the pandemic. However, Williams was still able to get back to the NCAA Tournament one last time before suffering his first and only first round loss, and he now turns over a talented group of rising sophomores to long time assistant and first time head coach Hubert Davis.
Like Duke and Kentucky, North Carolina’s freshmen guards struggled, but the team’s army of giants was so dominant in the paint that the Tar Heels were still able to manage an at large bid. Guard play shouldn't be a problem this year, as Davis will have a ton of options available on the perimeter and a full offseason to help them prepare. As the five star freshman entrusted with the offense from the beginning of the year, Caleb Love was the player most obviously affected by the canceled preseason. Love (10.5 ppg., 3.6 apg., 31.6% fg., 26.6% 3pt.) struggled mightily shooting the basketball all season until the final six game stretch, where he did manage to shoot a respectable 38.2% from beyond the arc. Even then, he wasn’t shooting well overall and he still had turnover problems at times. Love really came in as a combo guard, so a full offseason will be particularly important for him to develop as a facilitator. He’ll now be the first non-freshman starting point guard for the Tar Heels since Joel Berry in the 2017-2018 season, and that can only be a good thing. If Love isn’t significantly improved, he isn’t the only option at point guard. Fellow sophomore R.J. Davis is quicker and smoother off the dribble and looked better shooting the basketball than Love as a freshman, and he might have been the more highly regarded player if he were four inches taller. Like Love, Davis (8.4 ppg.) came in as a combo guard and will also benefit from a full offseason. Anthony Harris also had his moments after returning from the knee injury that cut his freshman year short. Harris provided the team with energy off the bench and made good decisions with the basketball, although like many others he will be at risk of getting lost in a crowded rotation. Kerwin Walton returns at shooting guard after being the only consistent perimeter threat on the team last season. While he isn’t physically explosive, Walton (10.0 ppg., 43.4% 3pt. after the first six games) is crafty with the basketball and knows how to get his shot off. He should find it easier to get open looks as a sophomore with more weapons around him. Senior small forward Leaky Black still hasn’t regained confidence in his ability to shoot the basketball, and it appears unlikely he will with so many players looking to score around him; however, he was a key to whatever cohesiveness the offense was able to sustain last season, and at 6-7 he’s a difference maker defensively and helpful on the boards. While Love was the player most obviously affected by the lack of an offseason, Puffy Johnson barely received any chances to play. He should be much stronger as a sophomore, and his ability to shoot the basketball at 6-8 should earn him more playing time. Two top 70 recruits will also be in the mix, although minutes could be hard to come by. 6-7 forward Dontrez Styles is the more likely of the pair to earn playing time; with big men now floating to the perimeter offensively, it will become more important for small forwards to help attack the offensive glass from the weak side, and rebounding is a skill that Styles will provide immediately. 6-4 guard D’Marco Dunn is another highly regarded perimeter shooter, and after last season that’s a skill the Tar Heels can’t have too much of.
The departure of Kessler and Brooks may have been a signal that it was going to be difficult for North Carolina to hold on to big men with NBA aspirations while continuing to deploy an offense that limited opportunities for them to display the perimeter skills the NBA covets. With that being the case, the biggest change under Davis appears to be a move to a more modern offense that includes a stretch four, with three of the four big men on the roster having the ability to hit an open 3. The one player that doesn’t, 6-10 Armando Bacot (12.3 ppg., 7.8 rpg.), led the team in scoring and rebounding and tied for the lead in blocks on his way to being named third team All Conference last season. Bacot’s hands improved significantly around the basket as a sophomore, and his length and motor will be essential for the Tar Heels to maintain any sense of authority in the paint. His minutes will increase after the front court exodus, and he will have an excellent chance to be first team All Conference as a junior. Bacot will probably be joined in the starting lineup by Marquette transfer Dawson Garcia, a 6-11 stretch five that was on the Big East All Freshman team last season. While he’s not an explosive athlete, Garcia (13.0 ppg., 6.6 rpg., 35.6% 3pt.) is a good shooter that also has some ability to attack off the dribble and should become a better rebounder as he gets stronger. Although he may start as a stretch four, many of his minutes will come in the post. The addition of 6-9 Oklahoma stretch four Brady Manek (10.2 ppg., 5.2 rpg., 38.3% 3pt.) was a surprise at the time because his shooting ability and lack of presence in the paint make him the opposite of the traditional Carolina big, but it was his signing that essentially announced the team’s new offensive approach and probably helped to eventually land Garcia. The late signing of Garcia probably wasn’t welcome news to Justin McCoy, who left UVA to escape the bench and Tony Bennett’s fickle rotation. He was only the second big man on the roster at the time that he signed, and now the assumption will be that he is on the outside looking in at playing time. McCoy is a skilled 6-8 big man with the type of length and bouncy energy that is perfect for attacking the offensive boards; while he didn’t get the chance to do that at Virginia (the Cavaliers don’t stick around for that), he did lead the team in rebounds per minute. His rebounding and defensive edge should still give him a chance to compete with Manek for minutes. If the Tar Heels are going to continue to be one of the better offensive rebounding teams in the country (UNC led college basketball in the category last year), McCoy and Dontrez Styles will need to be a part of it.
It seemed as though the open transfer market would make it less likely for teams to accumulate more talent than they would actually have playing time for, but the Tar Heels were among the few programs that defied those expectations. Thanks in part to a few of his own important additions from the transfer portal, Hubert will have plenty of talented players competing for playing time and the personnel necessary to implement a more modern offensive approach. The Tar Heels struggled to shoot the 3 last season (263rd in 3pt.%), but that problem should be more than addressed through an improving group of rising sophomores and the additional spacing provided by stretch fours and at times even a stretch five. The obvious trade off for that adjustment will be compromising their dominance on the offensive boards, although Bacot, McCoy, and Styles will keep them competitive, and it’s not as though the Tar Heels are going to stop sending people to the glass whenever a shot goes up. North Carolina is also routinely among the best teams in college basketball at passing and taking care of the basketball, but they were merely average in that area last season (144th in assist to turnover ratio); that, too, should be effectively addressed with a full offseason for the rising sophomores. Defensively, this team is not going to block shots like it did a year ago (the Tar Heels were 22nd in blocked shots per game last season), and Sharpe and Kessler are going to be missed in the paint; there will, however, be plenty of competition for playing time and no one will need to play huge minutes, so defensive intensity should be high. Hubert Davis will be stepping into a great situation with the program that he’s never really left, and he will have every opportunity to compete for an ACC Championship in year one.
2020-2021: 13-7, 8-5 in the ACC (7th )
Departures: Carlik Jones (16.8 ppg., 4.9 rpg., 4.5 apg.) and David Johnson (12.6 ppg., 5.8 rpg., 3.2 apg., 38.6% 3pt.) entered the NBA Draft; Quinn Slazinski (6.2 ppg., 3.6 rpg.) transferred to Iona, Josh Nickelberry transferred to LaSalle, and Aidan Igiehon transferred to Grand Canyon; Charles Minlend is a senior that will not return
Seniors taking an extra year: Malik Williams
Major Additions: 5-11 Marshall transfer Jarrod West, 6-3 Florida transfer Noah Locke, 6-3 top rated junior college transfer Elbert Ellis, 6-7 Miami transfer Matt Cross, 6-8 top 10 junior college transfer Sydney Curry, 6-10 top 70 recruit Roosevelt Wheeler, and 6-6 top 75 recruit Michael James
Preseason Projection: 3rd in the ACC; Sweet Sixteen
Louisville ended last season in a heartbreaking position that may never exist again, waiting on a call that never came as the first alternate for a Covid-threatened NCAA Tournament. That alternate status also kept the Cardinals from competing in the NIT, which has been a building block for successful teams in the past. Like most of the ACC, Louisville experienced significant roster turnover in the offseason, including the loss of a backcourt with professional potential; however, Chris Mack is one of the few ACC coaches that may have been able to assemble a team with more depth and talent than it had last season.
Small conference transfers can be very hit and miss, but Mack hit big with Carlik Jones at point guard a year ago, and he will need to find similar success with Marshall transfer Jarrod West this season. There is definitely reason for optimism; while West is two inches shorter than Jones at 5-11, he comes from a tougher conference, posted similar shooting numbers, and maintained a gaudy 3 to 1 assist to turnover ratio (better than Jones at Radford). West (12.5 ppg., 6.0 apg., 2.5 spg., 40.8% 3pt.) will also provide more ball pressure than Jones after finishing 11th in college basketball in steals a year ago. He won’t have to be an All-ACC player like Jones for the Cardinals to be successful, but he does need to make good decisions, hit open shots, and compete defensively, and those things shouldn’t be a problem. Two highly regarded 6-3 newcomers will compete for Johnson’s spot in the backcourt. Noah Locke is a former top 70 recruit that shot the ball well for Florida last season (10.6 ppg., 40.4% 3pt.), although he hasn’t provided much beyond that to this point. Elbert Ellis was a two time junior college All-American and is considered one of two best JUCO recruits entering Division I. Without another traditional point guard, Ellis will need to serve as West's backup. Like Locke, he can shoot, but it may be the other aspects of their games that determines who starts. It wouldn’t be a huge surprise to see 6-7 transfer Matt Cross receive minutes at any position from 2 to 4; while he didn’t touch the ball much at Miami (6.9 ppg., 3.5 rpg., 40% 3pt.), when he did he was an outstanding shooter and he flashed the ability to pass and rebound effectively as well. Perimeter shooting was a major weakness for Louisville last season (the Cardinals finished 297th in 3pt.%), but Mack appears to have addressed it successfully with the additions of West, Locke, Ellis, and Cross. 6-5 sophomore D'Andre Davis was a starter for much of last season, but with the team’s increased depth he will need to show improvement at the offensive end to avoid losing minutes. It could be tough for freshman Michael James, a 6-6 top 75 recruit, to find minutes as a freshman, but he give Mack another hard working, athletic option if other players don’t work out.
The health of fifth year senior Malik Williams will be a major variable for determining how high Louisville’s ceiling can be. When healthy, the former five star recruit is a mobile, skilled 6-11 stretch five that rebounds his position well and would provide significantly more rim protection than anyone the Cardinals had available last year. Unfortunately, his availability will be a big if after two occurences of the same foot injury cost him all but three games last season. On the other hand, a player that Mack did have available, Jae’Lyn Withers, was outstanding playing out of position at center as a redshirt freshman. Despite being somewhat undersized at 6-8, 230 pounds, Withers (10.1 ppg., 7.7 rpg., 38.1% 3pt.) more than held his own on the boards and provided enough of a deterrent on the back end for Mack’s pack line defense to remain the team’s strength. Withers is an ideal stretch four that shot well when given the opportunity, and even if Williams isn't healthy other roster additions should allow him to play primarily at his natural position. He could emerge as the team’s best player as a sophomore. A second former five star recruit, Samuel Williamson, still hasn’t figured things out offensively beyond scoring in the paint and rarely makes good things happen at the defensive end. However, he did become comfortable asserting himself on the boards as a sophomore, averaging 10.9 rebounds over the teams last seven games. If that confidence spreads to other parts of his game, he could have a breakthrough junior year. JJ Traynor flashed tantalizing potential as a true freshman last season; he has great length and athleticism, shot the ball well when given the opportunity, and actually led the team in blocked shots. If Williamson doesn’t develop further, Traynor could be in line for more minutes as he continues to add weight to what was a very lean 6-8 frame. If not this year, he will be a very good college basketball player at some point. 6-8, 260 pound junior college transfer Sydney Curry gives Mack a different option and some insurance at center; he's a mobile and well conditioned bully in the paint, and bulk was definitely something the roster had been missing. Roosevelt Wheeler, a 6-10 top 70 recruit, missed his senior year of high school with an achilles injury; while he should be healthy, he may need more time to develop. If he can contribute, he’s a traditional center that rebounds and blocks shots.
Even if Malik Williams’ feet don’t hold up and one or two of the newcomers aren’t ready right away, Chris Mack was somehow able to hold on to more players than he is likely to use, so the Cardinals should still have plenty of talent to put on the floor. Between their poor shooting and the fact that David Johnson (3.2 topg.) never completely got past his turnover problems, Louisville struggled with offensive efficiency last season, but Johnson has since departed and the team added several established perimeter shooters. This team won with defense and rebounding (118th in fg% defense, 27th in 3pt.% defense, 46th in rebounding margin), and that may actually improve as well with a larger frontcourt and with what was a young roster continuing to develop physically. While there will be a lot of new pieces to integrate, Louisville shouldn’t have to worry about the bubble this year, and if the roster is healthy the Cardinals should manage multiple wins in March.
Florida State Seminoles
2020-2021: 18-7, 11-4 in the ACC (2nd); lost to Michigan in the NCAA Sweet 16
Departures: Scottie Barnes (10.3 ppg., 4.0 rpg., 4.1 apg., 1.5 spg.), RaiQuan Gray (11.9 ppg., 6.4 rpg.), Balsa Koprivica (9.1 ppg., 5.6 rpg., 1.4 bpg.), and M.J. Walker (12.2 ppg., 42.3% 3pt.) entered the NBA Draft; Sardaar Calhoun transferred to Texas Tech and Nate Jack transferred to Cleveland St.
Seniors taking an extra year: RayQuan Evans and Tanor Ngom
Major Additions: 6-6 top 25 recruit Matthew Cleveland, 6-4 top 30 recruit Jalen Warley, 6-3 Houston transfer Caleb Mills, 6-6 Kentucky transfer Cam'Ron Fletcher, and 7-1 top 70 recruit John Butler
Preseason Projection: 4th in the ACC; NCAA Round of 32
Florida St. was one of two teams that allowed the ACC to salvage any semblance of respectability in last year’s NCAA Tournament, and Leonard Hamilton was also one of only two ACC coaches that remained as successful recruiting this year as he had been in the past. Hamilton has led the Seminoles to at least two victories in each of the last three Tournaments that were held, and based on winning percentage the team for the Covid shortened 2019-2020 season may have been his best. The Seminoles do lose four of their top five players, but that is nothing new for Hamilton, and there is plenty of replacement talent coming in.
The first priority for rebuilding the Seminoles will have to be deciding who will take over at point guard, a role that Scottie Barnes filled admirably last year. Caleb Mills (13.2 ppg., 36.5% 3pt. at Houston in 2019-2020) transferred with a desire to have the ball in his hands more often, but he’s never been much of a facilitator and his offensive game more closely resembles that of M.J. Walker than Barnes. Jalen Warley, a top 30 recruit, has more potential as a distributor and is noted for his understanding of the game, although he is also a capable scorer that could look for his own offense more often than Barnes. Warley seems like the better bet to keep the offense flowing somewhat efficiently. RayQuan Evans (5.1 ppg., 36.0% 3pt.) returns for an extra year and was technically the team’s starting point guard, but beyond hitting a respectable percentage from 3 he still wasn’t very productive as a senior. The team’s best returning player will be Anthony Polite. Polite (10.1 ppg., 4.5 rpg., 1.4 spg., 43.6% 3pt.) consistently makes good decisions and shot the ball extremely well last season, and at 6-6 he’s a lock down defender at the defensive end. He should contend for an All-ACC team and garner NBA attention as a senior. Five star recruit Matthew Cleveland is already a projected first round pick in most mock drafts; he’s a physically explosive, slashing 6-6 scorer that should also contribute immediately defensively and on the boards. Kentucky transfer Cam’Ron Fletcher was a top 75 recruit a year ago that proved to be a work in progress offensively, but he should be significantly better with a full offseason. He’s another tough and athletic 6-6 player that should fit right in to the rotation. The roster is light at power forward, so Cleveland or Fletcher should see time at the 4 in smaller lineups. Wyatt Wilkes (38.1% 3pt.), a 6-8 senior, is still around to serve as a designated shooter off the bench, although he’s never been quick enough to find many open looks.
With the departure of Koprovica and Gray, Malik Osborne is the only skilled big man left on the roster. The 6-9, 225 pound Osborne (5.9 ppg., 4.5 rpg., 36.5% 3pt. in 19 mpg.) has been playing out of position at center often since arriving at Florida St., but he definitely has the mobility and range to successfully replace Gray at power forward. While he can’t create off the dribble or pass as well as Gray, he is a better shooter. Osborne's minutes and production should increase significantly as a senior, although the desire to keep five offensively skilled players on the court will likely force him to continue to see time in the post down the stretch of games. A second player taking advantage of the extra year of eligibility, Tanor Ngom, should take over in the post. While his minutes were limited by the talent in front of him, Ngom clearly became more comfortable as the season progressed, and by the end of the year he was beginning to display energy and athleticism that are unique for a 7-1 player. 7-3 junior college transfer Naheem McLeod will finally join the Seminoles after originally signing with them after high school. Along with 6-11 sophomore Quincy Ballard, he’ll provide additional rim protection behind Ngom. Hamilton also added 7-1 top 70 recruit John Butler, but he is so lean at this point that a redshirt year seems likely. Unfortunately, none of the remaining centers can approach Koprovica's offensive skill level in the post.
Thanks largely to outstanding shooting (33rd in fg%, 23rd in 3pt.%), last year’s Seminoles were the most efficient offensive team Leonard Hamilton has ever coached. The loss of Gray and Koprivica will leave the frontcourt significantly less skilled overall this season and Gray’s ability as a supplemental facilitator will particularly be missed, so that efficiency is going to take a hit; however, there is still plenty of perimeter shooting and there are at least multiple options at point guard. Defensively, the Seminoles should excel once more (FSU finished last season 17th in fg% defense, 63rd in rebounding margin, and 11th in blocks) with plenty of depth, size, and athleticism, although they will sacrifice rebounding and rim protection when they move to smaller lineups. Following postseason and offseason success that most of the ACC should be envious of, Florida State should again compete at the top of the conference and be a threat to make a run in March.
2020-2021: 18-7, 13-4 in the ACC (1st); lost to Ohio in the 1st round of the NCAA Tournament
Departures: Jay Huff (13.0 ppg., 7.1 rpg., 2.6 bpg., 38.7% 3pt.), Sam Hauser (16.0 ppg., 6.8 rpg., 41.7% 3pt.), Trey Murphy (11.3 ppg., 43.3% 3pt.), and Tomas Woldentensae (41.8% 3pt.) entered the NBA Draft; Casey Morsell transferred to NC State, Justin McKoy transferred to North Carolina, and Jabri Abdur-Rahim transferred to Georgia
Major Additions: 6-4 Indiana transfer Armaan Franklin, 6-7 East Carolina transfer Jayden Gardner, 6-9 European recruit Igor Milicic Jr., and 6-5 top 90 recruit Taine Murray
Preseason Projection: 5th in the ACC; NCAA Round of 64
After winning a National Title in the last pre-pandemic Tournament, Virginia once again suffered a huge 1st round Tournament upset by losing to the 13 seed Ohio. On the bright side, following the offseason departure of a huge amount of talent and experience, Tony Bennett’s Cavaliers are unlikely to be at risk of a similar upset this season.
Virginia was one of the most efficient offensive teams in the country last season (32nd in fg%, 28th in 3pt.%, and 8th in assist to turnover ratio), but with the departures of Hauser, Huff, and Murphy, the question will be where points are going to come from. Senior Kihei Clark (9.5 ppg., 4.5 apg.) has been a team leader since arriving at the school; he provides outstanding ball pressure, makes good decisions with the basketball, and doesn’t miss opportunities to score when they present themselves. However, his limited size and athleticism can result in turnovers when defenses are allowed to focus on him, and he needs space to hit his jumper consistently. The Cavaliers probably need to be less dependent on Clark to retain offensive efficiency, not more. Less Clark can only mean more Reece Beekman. Beekman was the player most capable of breaking down a defense off the dribble last season, but without a preseason he never became confident enough to look for his own shot. Otherwise, he looked the part of a top 50 recruit, leading the team in steals and posting a better assist to turnover ratio than Clark. With his first full offseason under his belt and fewer established scorers to defer to, he should be a different offensive player as a sophomore. Transfer Armaan Franklin will be the likely third starter in a three guard lineup after having a breakthrough sophomore season at Indiana. Franklin (11.4 ppg., 4.1 rpg., 42.4% 3pt.) shoots well from the perimeter and can also take players off the dribble; he should emerge as one of Virginia’s leading scorers. At 6-4, Franklin’s also shown a willingness to compete on the boards, which the team will need following the loss of Huff and Hauser. Taine Murray, a 6-5 top 90 recruit from New Zealand, is one of two freshmen that could see time right away due to the high roster turnover. Murray has already filled out physically and he played against adults in the Australian professional league last season, so he will only have to adjust to the style of play. If he picks things up quickly, he’ll provide another perimeter shooting threat. Kody Stattmann will provide a larger option at small forward after missing almost all of his junior year due to illness. While he doesn’t have Murphy’s physical explosion, he has similar length at 6-7 and uses his feet well to shadow offensive players. Stattmann hasn’t shot well to this point, but he did show potential in that area in high school. Sophomore Carson McCorkle drew comparisons to Kyle Guy coming out of high school and could contribute as a perimeter scorer, but he wasn’t nearly as productive as Guy in high school while playing in a lower division and unlike Guy he wasn’t able to win minutes as a freshman, so those comparisons have to be taken with a grain of salt.
Redshirt sophomore Kadin Shedrick, originally a top 60 recruit, was expecting to take over as the backup center last year, but an illness cost him most of the season. While he still hasn’t added much weight to his 6-11 frame, his per minute rebounding numbers were better than Huff’s when he did play, and combined with his shot blocking ability there is reason to believe he will be a comparable replacement defensively and on the boards. He will not, however, serve as a stretch five. 6-7 East Carolina transfer Jayden Gardner will give the Cavaliers at least one established frontcourt player. Gardner (18.3 ppg., 8.3 rpg.) was an outstanding scorer and rebounder in all three of his years in the AAC. He should at least be able to replace Hauser’s rebounding, and he has an ability to create his own scoring opportunities in and around the paint that Virginia was missing last season. Unfortunately, Gardener shot just 47.9% from the field at East Carolina with almost no attempts from 3; if that were to fall as a result of the increased size and athleticism of the ACC, he might actually end up hurting offensive efficiency. If the Cavaliers are going to have a big man that can stretch the floor, it will have to be Polish freshman Igor Milicic. Milicic is a mobile, athletic 6-9 prospect with the type of face up skills the NBA covets; he has a ton of potential and, like Murray, he played in a professional league against adults last season. Milicic will be an incredibly important player for Virginia; if he isn’t ready to contribute immediately, the Cavaliers will be transitioning from having five guys on the court at a time that can shoot from the perimeter to three. 7-0, 250 pound junior Francisco Caffaro will give Bennett a larger option in the post, but his reflexes and agility are limited and he hasn’t provided much beyond passable rebounding and positional defense.
The sudden and drastic increase in transfers could hit Virginia harder than anyone. Tony Bennett had become accustomed to allowing players a year to develop and adapt to his offensive and defensive systems before handing them major roles, but that may not be an option anymore. McKoy and Abdur-Rahim, a top 40 recruit a year ago, seemed destined for larger roles, but those minutes will now potentially go to either less talented players or players new to the system. Even with the addition of Franklin and Gardner, there are currently only six players on the roster that would normally be likely parts of the rotation, and even that requires Stattmann and Shedrick to step up after missing most of last season with illnesses. Freshmen and transfers will have to play significant roles out of necessity, and their lack of time in the defensive system will definitely impact what is normally Virginia's calling card. The effectiveness of Bennett’s pack line defense had actually already fallen off last season (73rd in fg% defense and 194th in 3pt.% defense); combine the effect of an inexperienced roster with the loss of two outstanding defensive players in Huff and Murphy, and suddenly Virginia might have a problem stopping people from scoring. Offensive efficiency could also suffer as a result of losing the ability to stretch the floor, although that will at least be partially offset through the expected improvement of Beekman and by having more ways to score in the paint. While there is definitely still talent here, the primary reason to believe that this will still be an NCAA Tournament team is because of the program’s consistent success under Bennett. UVA may still be good, but for the first time in five years, and the second time in nine years, the Cavaliers at the very least seem unlikely to contend for an ACC title.
Virginia Tech Hokies
2020-2021: 15-7, 9-4 in the ACC (3rd); lost to Florida in the 1st round of the NCAA Tournament
Departures: Cartier Diarra (7.5 ppg.) entered the NBA Draft; Tyrece Radford (12.2 ppg., 5.9 rpg.) entered the transfer portal; Jalen Cone (9.2 ppg., 34.9% 3pt.) transferred to Northern Arizona and Joe Bamisile transferred to George Washington; Wabissa Bede and Cordell Pemsl are seniors that will not return
Major Additions: 6-0 Wofford transfer Storm Murphy and 6-10 Clemson transfer Lynn Kidd
Preseason Projection: 6th in the ACC; NCAA Round of 64
Mike Young’s Hokies exceeded expectations once again in his second season, finishing third in the ACC and winning Coach of the Year honors for Young along the way. While the season did end in disappointment with a first round loss in the NCAA Tournament, Virginia Tech appeared to be in position to contend for a conference title before Tyrece Radford's shocking last minute transfer decision significantly impacted their outlook for the upcoming season.
Prior to Radford's departure, there was reason to believe the Hokies would improve, particularly at the offensive end. That was due to the addition of graduate transfer Storm Murphy, who followed Young from Wofford after completing his degree and winning first team All-Southern Conference honors along the way. Murphy (17.8 ppg., 4.3 apg., 40.0% 3pt.) is in some ways the polar opposite of the point guard he will replace, Wabissa Bede, and he’s a more dynamic offensive threat than Jalen Cone. While he will not be the defensive player that Bede was, Murphy emerged as an outstanding shooter during his senior year, and he’s a capable distributor that is obviously already familiar with Young’s offense. Despite the step up in competition, Murphy could actually become more efficient offensively with more scoring talent around him at Virginia Tech, although he will obviously be taking fewer shots. Two outstanding juniors, Nahiem Alleyne (11.1 ppg., 40.8% 3pt.) and Hunter Cattoor (8.5 ppg., 43.3% 3pt.), should join Murphy in what is now likely to be a three guard lineup. Both are excellent perimeter shooters that improved noticeably as sophomores, while neither will provide anything resembling the impact Radford provided scoring around the paint and attacking the offensive and defensive glass. Radford was a dynamic x-factor that was nearly impossible for opponents to account for, and he recieved a well deserved honorable mention all-conference spot last season. Darius Maddox, a top 90 recruit a year ago that saw very few minutes behind a crowded backcourt and without the benefit of an offseason, will suddenly become a major part of the rotation. He should provide another capable scorer that will hit open 3’s, although again he won't provide the same dynamic as Radford.
Virginia Tech will still be a factor in the ACC due in large part to a dynamic pair of former transfers. Keve Aluma was expected to provide Virginia Tech with frontcourt stability and make them more competitive in the paint, but no one could have expected him to emerge as a second team All-ACC player in his first year of eligibility after following Young from the Southern Conference. Aluma (15.2 ppg., 7.9 rpg., 1.3 bpg., 35.1% 3pt.) had expanded his range and improved his timing as a shotblocker during his redshirt year, and he made a huge impact at both ends of the floor. Offensively he’s unselfish and can score inside and out, defensively, at 6-9, he has the mobility to defend multiple positions, and he attacks the boards at both ends of the floor. As much attention as Aluma received, Justyn Mutts provided more of the same and also had an outstanding first year in the ACC after transferring from Deleware. Mutts (9.5 ppg., 6.4 rpg., 33.3% 3pt.) is slightly shorter than Aluma at 6-7, but he’s more physically explosive. They are both prototype modern college frontcourt players and experienced seniors, and along with Radford would have given the Hokies what would have easily been the best returning frontcourt in the conference. Radford's departure could see Aluma and Mutts filling different roles for short periods of time, with the possibility that the pair could man the forward spots in larger lineups along with a traditional center. While they have the skill and athleticism to do so, it would mark a significant change from the guard oriented lineups Young was forced to use in his first year at the school. A second potentially impactful roster addition for the Hokies, 6-10 Clemson transfer Lynn Kidd, was originally a top 80 recruit in this year’s high school class before reclassifying to join Clemson last season. As an early entrant with no real offseason, Kidd received almost no opportunities behind a crowded rotation during his one year at Clemson (although he would have received plenty of opportunities had he returned this season) but did manage to put on significant weight, and he should be able to provide a productive traditional post presence off the bench. Even before the addition of Kidd, Young had promising frontcourt depth; 6-9 David N’Guessan showed potential as a post scorer and rebounder as a freshman and really only needed to add weight, while 6-10 junior John Ojiako was a productive rebounder and shotblocker in limited minutes as a freshman before struggling with a knee injury last season. If Young does decide to use larger lineups on occasion, he will have the frontcourt depth to do so.
Virginia Tech is still loaded with perimeter shooting including all five starters and their perimeter bench, and they have a dynamic and athletic pair of skilled forwards that can be disruptive at both ends of the floor. The Hokies were well above average offensively last season (110th in fg%, 95th in 3pt.%, and 59th in assist to turnover ratio); while the loss of Radford's scoring ability in and around the paint will hurt, overall that could be offset by the addition of Murphy and improved perimeter shooting. Defensively, they were above average (129th in fg% defense) and should continue to be that way; Bede will be missed, but frontcourt depth should be better and everyone competes. Regardless of whether they play big or small the Hokies will be playing with more size without Radford. Rebounding may actually be where his departure will be felt the most, as the Hokies were 106th in rebounding margin last season thanks in part to his ability sneak in for out of area rebounds. The improved frontcourt depth could help offset the loss of Radford there as well. While Radford's surprising transfer decision is likely to leave Virginia Tech fans wondering what might have been, there is still a very real possibility that Mike Young will have enough talent to lead the Hokies back to the NCAA Tournament.
Notre Dame Fighting Irish
2020-2021: 11-15, 7-11 in the ACC (11th)
Departures: Juwan Durham (10.7 ppg., 5.5 rpg., 1.9 bpg.) entered the NBA Draft; Nikola Djogo (5.0 ppg., 3.0 rpg., 40.9% 3pt.) transferred to Northeastern
Major Additions: 6-10 Yale transfer Paul Atkinson, 6-4 4 star recruit Blake Wesley, and 6-6 4 star recruit J.R. Konieczny
Preseason Projection: 7th in the ACC; NIT
Despite having two players make All-ACC teams, Notre Dame suffered a disappointing follow up to what might have been a return to the NCAA Tournament during the pandemic shortened 2019-2020 season. Still, Mike Brey was able to maintain a seemingly miraculous level of roster continuity relative to the rest of the conference, and that should be a huge advantage for the Irish, particularly early in the year.
Notre Dame’s scoring was remarkably well distributed last season, with six players averaging between 8 and 15 points per game. While five of those players are back, the most important player for the offense will continue to be senior point guard Prentiss Hubb. Despite being a third team all-conference pick, Hubb (14.6 ppg., 5.8 apg., 34.2% 3pt.) is still an inconsistent shooter that can force his own offense at times. Overall, the team’s offense was among the more efficient in the conference last season (71st in fg%, 46th in 3pt.%, and 19th in assist to turnover ratio), but that could still be improved through better ball movement and better decision making from Hubb. There is plenty of perimeter scoring talent around him. 6-6 senior Dane Goodwin (11.8 ppg., 5.2 rpg., 35.2% 3pt.) wasn’t able to improve upon his sophomore numbers with defenses focused on him at times, but he’s still a dangerous scorer that is becoming increasingly helpful on the defensive boards. 6-5 senior Trey Wertz (8.3 ppg., 42.9% 3pt.) received a surprise waiver to become immediately eligible in December, and he emerged as the second most accurate three point shooter on the team. As the only regular rotation player that was new to the offense last season, he may have the most room for improvement. After sitting out a year due to a transfer rule that has since been eliminated, 6-5 junior Cormac Ryan (9.9 ppg., 4.4 rpg., 34.4% 3pt.) proved to be a potentially prolific scorer as well. His willingness to throw around his wiry frame also allows him to be helpful defensively and on the boards. Like Hubb, Wertz and Ryan were both streaky shooters; improved consistency from all three veterans will be necessary for the Irish to improve on last year’s win total. Notre Dame clearly does not recruit players for their defensive prowess, but 6-7 forward Tony Sanders Jr. does have the length and athletic ability to help at that end of the floor. He should be better adapted to the offense as a sophomore, and his defensive potential could earn him playing time at both forward spots for a team that will struggle mightily at that end. Brey added two four star recruits to the mix as well, but it would be a surprise for them to see major minutes as freshmen with so many established veterans on the roster, and both will need to get physically stronger.
While the ball is most often in Hubb’s hands, Nate Laszewski clearly emerged as the team’s best player as a junior. Laszewski (13.3 ppg., 7.3 rpg., 58.9% fg., 43.4% 3pt.) was finally able to add enough weight to his 6-10 frame to be effective on the boards, and it seemed to increase his confidence in other aspects of his game as well. His shooting percentages went through the roof, and he led the Irish in 3 point shooting percentage and the ACC in adjusted field goal percentage on his way to being named third team all-conference. Laszewski looked like a future pro early on before fading under increased defensive pressure down the stretch, but he will have a chance to attract NBA attention as a senior. Any further improvement from him defensively and on the boards would be huge for the Irish. Juwan Durham, the team’s most effective defensive player, will be replaced by the more offensive minded Paul Atkinson (17.6 ppg., 7.3 rpg. at Yale in 2019-2020), a former Ivy League Co-Player of the Year that should provide another boost to offensive efficiency but will not replace Durham’s rim protection. Like Sanders, 6-9 Matt Zona received limited opportunities as a freshman, but his per minute rebounding numbers were the best on the team and he should be better prepared to help in other ways as a sophomore.
Mike Brey’s offense has a tendency to get substantially better as players gain experience in his system, and, with the exception of newcomer Paul Atkinson (who at least has several years of Division I experience), this team will be loaded with it. With a veteran roster led by two All-ACC players, Notre Dame's offensive efficiency should be among the best in college basketball. Unfortunately, Notre Dame was terrible defensively (210th in fg% defense, 308th in 3pt.% defense, and 278th in rebounding margin), and that isn’t likely to improve without Durham’s 1.9 blocks per game helping clean things up in the paint. Still, with much of the league in position to struggle, Notre Dame should be able to climb back into the top half of the conference and potentially challenge for an NCAA Tournament berth.
North Carolina State Wolfpack
2020-2021: 14-11, 9-8 in the ACC (9th); lost to Colorado St. in the NIT quarterfinals
Departures: DJ Funderburk (12.6 ppg., 5.6 rpg.) entered the NBA Draft; Shakeel Moore (6.8 ppg., 1.4 spg. in 18.5 mpg.) transferred to Mississippi St., Braxton Beverly (7.0 ppg., 40% 3pt.) transferred to Eastern Kentucky, and Nick Farrar transferred to Charleston
Senior taking an extra year: Devon Daniels (pure conjecture based on his absence from the NBA Draft pool and the transfer portal)
Major Additions: 6-9 top 60 recruit Ernest Ross, 6-3 Virginia transfer Casey Morsell, 6-3 top 90 recruit Terquavion Smith, and 6-8 Providence transfer Greg Gantt (4.0 ppg., 3.1 rpg.), 5-11 4 star recruit Breon Pass
Preseason Projection: 8th in the ACC; NIT
With the exception of his first year at the school when the roster was primarily composed of the remnants of Mark Gottfried’s last team, Kevin Keatts’ Wolfpack has consistently teetered on the edge of NCAA Tournament contention, including their second NIT appearance in as many tournaments last year. The departure of several key players, most notably the surprise transfer of developing potential star Shakeel Moore, and a lack of obvious incoming stars could find the team in a similar position this season.
While Moore did show significant potential, the player most likely to have a breakthrough sophomore campaign was always going to be Cam Hayes. Hayes (7.8 ppg., 3.1 apg., 1.3 spg., 36.4% 3pt.) was a top 50 recruit a year ago and had a promising and productive freshman year at both ends of the floor without the benefit of a full preseason; with more preparation and more consistent playing time following the departures of Moore and Braxton Beverly, it wouldn’t be a surprise for him to make an All-Conference team in his second year. Hayes is likely to be joined in the backcourt by either Virginia transfer Casey Morsell or freshman Terquavion Smith. Morsell was originally a top 50 recruit two years ago, but never became comfortable in Virginia’s slow paced offense and shot the ball poorly (39.6% fg. and 26.3% 3pt.); he could benefit tremendously from a move to NC State’s more uptempo approach. Smith, a top 90 recruit, is a confident, capable, and efficient scorer that should be ready to make an impact right away. Senior Thomas Allen (7.4 ppg., 1.3 spg., 37.9% 3pt.) will again offer an experienced perimeter threat off the bench, although he could lose playing time in a crowded backcourt. Four star combo guard Breon Pass could provide some of the same sort of speed and aggression as the departed Moore, but it won’t have quite the same impact as still having Moore around. The biggest variable for the success of this Wolfpack team will be the potential return of Devon Daniels at small forward. Daniels (16.5 ppg., 5.2 rpg., 3.3 apg., 1.7 spg., 34.5% 3pt.) had emerged as the team’s best player prior to tearing his ACL on January 27; he could conceivably be back in time for the start of the season if he decides to take advantage of the extra year of eligibility. His leadership at both ends of the floor would significantly boost NC State’s ceiling. Despite coming in as a point guard prospect, 6-7 sophomore Dereon Seabron is likely to again see most of his minutes at forward because of his height and the crowded backcourt. He performed well defensively and on the boards as a redshirt freshman despite the need to add weight, and he has the skills to do more on offense.
Like Daniels, Jericole Hellems (12.9 ppg., 5.0 rpg., 38.3% 3pt.) also took a big step forward last season. The 6-7 senior shot the ball much more efficiently, and along with Davis give the Wolfpack an athletic, experienced, and offensively dangerous pair of forwards. Unfortunately, at 205 pounds Hellems isn’t really big enough to be an ideal stretch four and can struggle to rebound his position and keep larger players out of the paint. At center, Manny Bates (9.8 ppg., 5.9 rpg., 2.7 bpg.) was still formidable but did not show significant improvement in his second year. The Wolfpack defense is heavily dependent on the 6-11 Bates’ shot blocking ability (they were 51st in blocks), but they need him to rebound better as well and he is still mostly limited to dunks offensively. Although 6-9 top 60 recruit Ernest Ross is the team’s most highly regarded freshman, he’s currently limited offensively as well and will need to add weight, so he may essentially be DJ Funderburk without the scoring as a freshman. Greg Gantt, a 6-8 former top 70 recruit at Providence, actually outweighs Ross at this point and was considered a small forward coming out of high school. He didn’t play particularly well at Providence, but he has potential as a stretch four.
NC State ran a fairly efficient offense last season (42nd in fg%, 69th in 3pt.%), although more prep time for their freshman guards definitely would have helped with turnovers (160th in assist to turnover ratio). Without DJ Funderburk, the Wolfpack won’t really have a post scoring threat this year and those shooting percentages could drop, but overall, with Daniels and Hellems back and the potential progress of Hayes at point guard, they could still improve offensively. The problem for the Wolfpack was defense and rebounding (254th in fg% defense, 215th in 3pt% defense, 227th in rebounding), and there’s not much reason to believe that will change significantly. Kevin Keatts likes to pressure the basketball (NC State was 36th in steals), but that doesn’t really work against the better ACC teams, and the team isn’t really built to defend in the half court. This looks like a very similar NC State team, and it should produce very similar results.
2020-2021: 10-17, 4-15 in the ACC (13th)
Departures: Earl Timberlake (9.3 ppg., 5.0 rpg., 1.7 spg.) transferred to Memphis, Chris Lykes (15.5 ppg., 4.0 rpg., 5.5 apg., 2.0 spg., 45.5% 3pt.) transferred to Arkansas, Nysier Brooks (7.4 ppg., 5.8 rpg.) transferred to Ole Miss, and Elijah Olaniyi (10.5 ppg., 5.1 rpg.) transferred back to Stony Brook
Seniors taking an extra year: Kameron McGusty
Major Additions: 6-6 George Mason transfer Jordan Miller (15.8 ppg., 6.1 rpg.), 5-11 DePaul transfer Charlie Moore (14.4 ppg. 4.2 apg., 34.6% 3pt.), 6-4 top 75 recruit Jakai Robinson, 6-1 top 100 recruit Bensley Joseph, and 6-4 4 star recruit Nisine Poplar
Preseason Projection: 9th in the ACC; NIT; possible lame-duck season for Jim Larranaga
Miami has been decimated with injuries the last two seasons, but it’s easy to think that there’s more going on with the program than that. The barrage of transfers is obviously concerning, and if the story about what happened with Matt Cross is to be believed then it is flat out disturbing. Cross was humiliatingly left sitting on the bench ready to go in with the primary camera pointed right at him for an entire game against Florida State while Larranaga used six scholarship players and a walk on. Larranaga later reported there were no disciplinary issues. If that’s true, anyone in their right mind would have transferred after that game. There is probably enough talent for a middle of the pack finish in the ACC (Anthony Walker should eventually be an NBA prospect), but if the Hurricanes have another year like the last two then it may be time for a change.
*Miami is currently under consideration by Jalen Duren, the number one recruit in next year's class that could reclassify.
2020-2021: 18-10, 9-7 in the ACC (8th); lost to Houston in the NCAA Sweet 16
Departures: Alan Griffin (13.3 ppg., 5.8 rpg., 1.6 bpg., 36.1% 3pt.) and Marek Dolezaj (9.8 ppg., 5.1 rpg., 3.3 apg.) entered the NBA Draft; Quincy Guerrier (13.7 ppg., 8.4 rpg.) transferred to Oregon, Kadary Richmond (6.3 ppg., 3.1 apg., 1.6 spg.) transferred to Seton Hall, Robert Braswell transferred to Charlotte, and Woody Newton transferred to Oklahoma State
Seniors taking an extra year: Bourama Sidibe
Major Additions: 6-8 top 25 recruit Benny Williams, 6-9 Villanova transfer Cole Swider, 6-3 Marquette transfer Symir Torrence, and 6-8 Cornell transfer Jimmy Boeheim
Preseason Projection: 10th in the ACC
For the third time in the last five NCAA Tournaments, Syracuse closed out their season with a postseason run that seemed shocking relative to their regular season success. The team has been on the bubble in each of those five years. With the departure of three of their top four players, Jim Boeheim’s Orange will again face an uphill battle if they are going to reach the postseason.
Last year’s Orange were particularly effective at passing and taking care of the basketball, finishing 28th in assist to turnover ratio thanks to three players that averaged over three assist per game. Joe Girard (9.8 ppg., 3.5 apg., 33.3% 3pt.) a scoring minded point guard that has shot the ball inconsistently in his first two years, is the only returning member of that group. While Girard is often able to find his own perimeter shot, he doesn't excel at getting into the paint. It briefly looked as though the Syracuse offense was going to be completely turned over to Girard by default and lose the dynamic that Kadary Richmond provided when Richmond entered the draft portal on May 30, but the Orange quickly added Symir Torrence, a player with a remarkably similar skillset, on May 31. Torrence was a top 75 recruit two years ago that received limited opportunities in his two years at Marquette; however, he entered college with a reputation for creating for his teammates off the dribble and for making an impact defensively, and that is exactly what Richmond did for the Orange last year. If Torrence can begin to fill that potential, it will be incredibly important for the Orange’s ability to remain efficient offensively. The offensive dynamic that Torrence could provide will be even more important following the departures of Quincy Guierrier and Alan Griffin for the NBA. While Buddy Boeheim (17.8 ppg., 38.3% 3pt.) was Syracuse’s leading scorer last season, Guerrier and Griffin were really the team’s best players, and their departure will place significantly more pressure on Boeheim. The 6-6 senior has become an increasingly dynamic scorer in his three years at the school, adding an ability to post up smaller defenders and attack off of hard closeouts to the perimeter shooting he’s known for. Boeheim is certain to get his points as a senior, but the questions will be if can continue to score as efficiently with less talent around him and if he will find open teammates when defenses focus on him. Griffin and Guerrier will be replaced by top 25 recruit Benny Williams, Villanova transfer Cole Swider, and Buddy’s brother Jimmy. Williams is a great athlete and a strong perimeter shooter that will find the open man, but he’s so thin at this point (under 200 pounds at 6-8) that he’s unlikely to be effective in the paint as a freshman. The 6-9 Swider (5.7 ppg., 40.2% 3pt. at Villanova) has never provided much beyond spot up 3 point shooting in his three years at Villanova. Jimmy Boeheim, a 6-8 forward, has essentially been a less effective version of Buddy in his three years at Cornell (16.7 ppg., 5.6 rpg. In 2019-2020). None of the three will have the impact defensively or on the boards that Griffin and Guerrier provided, and none will be able to score inside the arc as effectively as Guerrier.
Even though there are no new players involved, the biggest change for this team will be at center. Marek Dolezaj was a fascinating player that scored efficiently, helped facilitate the offense, and willingly threw his body around at both ends of the court despite the fact that, at 6-10, he may have cheated to weigh in at over 200 pounds as a senior. He could be pushed around a bit. His replacement will be almost his exact opposite. While he only outweighs Dolezaj by 20 pounds or so, Jesse Edwards is an imposing presence in the paint that has been particularly effective on the boards and has potential as a shotblocker. However, his coordination still hasn’t caught up with his 6-11 frame, and his offensive skills are very much a work in progress. If 6-10 senior Bourama Sidibe (6.0 ppg., 7.6 rpg., 1.4 bpg. In 2019-2020) is fully recovered from his knee injury during his fifth year, he would still present similar offensive limitations, although he has much better timing and explosion as a shotblocker than Edwards. Last year was a bad time to be a freshman, but it was a horrible time to be an early entrant, and with the team’s depth at center Frank Anselem saw almost no playing time. Anselem was a top 80 recruit before reclassifying, and he added significant weight to his 6-10 frame during what was essentially a redshirt year. He has the potential to eventually be better than both Edwards and Sidibe, so even if Sidibe’s knee doesn’t hold up the team will have depth in the post.
Rebounding is always a problem for Syracuse because of their zone (265th last season), and, while a more substantial center will help, the departure of Griffin and particularly Guerrier is going to exacerbate the situation. Defense is consistently a strength (47th in fg% defense, 72nd in 3pt.% defense last season), but their absence, and potentially that of Kadary Richmond, will be felt there as well. The Orange were 34th in steals per game last season, and that particular number is set to fall substantially. Offensively, there is a ton of perimeter shooting talent, but it will be more of a challenge to free those shooters for open looks without interior scorers like Guerrier and Dolezaj, and even if Torrence is able to emulate the creativity Richmond provided off the dribble last season, Dolezaj’s passing from the high post is also going to be missed. At 76 years old with two sons playing their senior years, it wouldn’t be surprising for this to be Jim Boeheim’s last year coaching the Orange. Following an offseason highlighted by damaging departures, things won’t get any easier for Syracuse, but recent history suggests the team could still find ways to win. If not, there will be more familial reasons for the Boeheims to enjoy the season.
Wake Forest Demon Deacons
2020-2021: 6-16, 3-15 in the ACC (14th)
Departures: Ian DuBose (10.9 ppg., 4.6 rpg., 36.1% 3pt.) and Jonah Antonio (6.4 ppg., 40% 3pt.) entered the NBA Draft; Ismael Massoud (8.3 ppg., 3.4 rpg.) transferred to Kansas State, Ody Oguama (7.6 ppg, 5.4 rpg.) transferred to Cincinnati, Jahcobi Neath transferred to Wisconsin, Jalen Johnson (5.0 ppg.) transferred to Mercer, Emmanuel Okpomo transferred to Temple, and Isaiah Wilkins transferred to Longwood
Major Additions: 6-6 East Tennessee State transfer Damari Monsanto, 6-10 Ole Miss transfer Khadim Sy, 6-6 4 star recruit Lucas Taylor, 6-4 4 star recruit Cameron Hildreth, 7-0 Colorado transfer Dallas Walton, 6-5 Oklahoma transfer Alondes Williams, and 6-9 Indiana St. transfer Jake LaRavia (12.3 ppg., 6.3 rpg.)
Preseason Projection: 11th in the ACC
Steve Forbes stepped into a nearly impossible situation at Wake Forest last season, as he attempted to integrate his own offensive and defensive systems on the fly to a new program and roster without the benefit of preseason practices, scrimmages, and games. The results were entirely predictable, although he was somehow able to win enough games in the ACC to avoid a last place finish. Now, thanks to moderate success in both the transfer portal and high school recruiting, an offseason that saw the majority of Danny Manning’s former recruits leave the program seems to have left Forbes with a roster that is actually more talented than the one he started with a year ago. He’ll also have the benefit of a full offseason to get his new players at least close to being on the same page, so there is reason for significant optimism for the Demon Deacons heading into year two.
Offensive efficiency was consistently a strength of Forbes’ East Tennessee State teams, but with only ETSU transfer Daivien Williamson fully understanding what Forbes wanted to do that wasn’t going to happen last season (Wake Forest finished 300th in field goal percentage and 272nd in assist to turnover ratio). Still, Williamson (12.9 ppg., 37.2% 3pt.) adjusted extremely well to ACC competition and, perhaps because of that familiarity, he was the most consistent member of the team. He should only get better as a senior. Williamson was joined in the backcourt midseason by early entrant Carter Whitt, who was still considered a top 70 recruit after reclassifying. With no preparation and an obvious need for time in a college weight room, Whitt understandably struggled early on, particularly with turnovers. However, he eventually acquitted himself relatively well down the stretch, averaging three assists versus two turnovers per game while shooting 40.6% from 3 over the team’s last eleven games. He should be significantly improved as a sophomore, and the backcourt of Whitt and Williamson should spearhead a dramatic improvement in offensive efficiency. Oklahoma transfer Alondes Williams and a pair of four star recruits, Cameron Hildreth and Lucas Taylor, will give Forbes options off the bench. Williams (6.7 ppg.) will offer experience and explosive athleticism, although he hasn’t shot the ball well to this point. Hildreth is a 6-4 British import that should be ready to score, while Taylor is particularly dangerous behind the arc.
Forbes will have a dynamic pair of forwards to pair with his improving backcourt. The most exciting addition to the team will be Damari Monsanto, the reigning Southern Conference Freshman of the Year that Forbes originally recruited to ETSU. Monsanto is a confident and improving scorer that can create his own shot both in the paint and on the perimeter; after a slow start, he averaged 13.4 points per game on 39.5% shooting from 3 over his team's last 20 games. Monsanto’s also strong and mobile at 6-6, 225 pounds, and he will be a significant improvement over Ismael Massoud on the boards (7.3 rpg at ETSU). While he will have to adjust to the ACC, he is just a rising sophomore and has plenty of potential for further improvement. Senior Isaiah Mucius is one of only two productive Danny Manning recruits that decided to stick with Forbes for year two. While he didn’t take a huge step forward last season, he will have a much better understanding of what Forbes wants to do this year. Mucius (10.3 ppg., 5.2 rpg., 34.2% 3pt.), a former top 60 recruit, still has the length and athletic ability to do more, and he should be more consistent as a senior. The late addition of Khadim Sy, a former Virginia Tech recruit that started for Ole Miss two years ago before suffering with illness and injury last year (9.0 ppg., 5.5 rpg. in 2019-2020), will give the Deacons a boost in both post defense and interior scoring. At 6-10, Sy’s larger and stronger than Ody Oguama and more mobile than Emmanuel Okpomo; he’ll provide some semblance of rim protection that Wake Forest didn’t have a year ago, and he’s much further along offensively than either departed post player. Tariq Ingraham would provide a rebounding force off the bench if he can stay healthy. Wake Forest also added stretch five Dallas Walton from Colorado (6.5 ppg., 47.4% 3pt.), although at 7-0 he doesn’t block shots or provide much help on the boards. Indiana St. transfer Jake LaRavia seemed like an important addition at the time, but subsequent additions may make it hard for him to find playing time.
Steve Forbes was consistently successful in his five years at East Tennessee State, and his teams particularly excelled with regards to offensive efficiency and rebounding. Most of the personnel changes seemed to be designed to help with both; an improved backcourt, along with two players more comfortable scoring inside, will help with offensive efficiency, while Sy and Monsanto will help with rebounding (the Deacons were 233rd in rebounding margin last season). Defense was the team’s biggest issue last season (305th in fg% defense and 323rd in 3pt.% defense), and that should also improve with a full offseason to get organized in addition to the arrival of a more complete post defender. While it may be too soon to expect Wake Forest to compete for an NCAA Tournament berth, year two under Forbes should be very different from year one, and an NIT appearance may not be outside the realm of possibility.
2020-2021: 16-8, 10-6 in the ACC (tie for 5th); lost to Rutgers in the 1st round of the NCAA Tournament
Departures: Aamir Simms (13.4 ppg., 6.4 rpg., 2.7 apg., 40% 3pt.) and Jonathan Baehre (3.4 rpg.) entered the NBA Draft; Olivier-Maxence Prosper transferred to Marquette, Clyde Trapp (7.3 ppg., 5.3 rpg., 35.1% 3pt.) transferred to Charlotte, John Newman transferred to Cincinnati, and Lynn Kidd transferred to Virginia Tech
Major Additions: 6-4 South Florida transfer David Collins, 6-6 Youngstown St. transfer Naz Bohannon, and 6-3 4 star recruit Joshua Beadle
Preseason Projection: 12th in the ACC
While Clemson’s season ended with disappointment in the first round of the NCAA Tournament, last year was the second best regular season showing for the team in the Brad Brownell era. Unfortunately, the offseason got off to a terrible start for Brownell, as the seemingly inevitable loss of his best player (Simms) was compounded by the loss of his best guard (Trapp) and his best prospect (Prosper). A long bench and inconsistent minutes seem to have alienated several players, although that definitely won’t be a problem this season. After significant attrition, the Tigers have been left with substantially less depth and talent.
The most positive story for Clemson last season was probably the success of 5-10 point guard Nick Honor, who flourished as a transfer after his redshirt year. Honor (8.1 ppg., 36.7% 3pt., 1.3 spg.) is a particularly tough and aggressive player that doesn’t possess tremendous athleticism or size. He was actually more efficient offensively at Clemson than he had been at Fordham in the A 10, and he led the team in steals. While he could continue to get more efficient and his minutes will increase, his ceiling likely isn’t much higher than the season he put together last year. Al-Amir Dawes (9.0 ppg., 39.4% 3pt.) should be able to regain his starting job and start next to Honor as a junior. Dawes shot the ball extremely well last year, and his quickness makes him the Clemson player most capable of creating his own shot. The third starting guard could be Alex Hemenway, who was a particularly interesting part of Brownell’s rotation last year. Hemenway is a very good perimeter shooter (38.7% 3pt.), and that seemed to be enough for him to win a starting job down the stretch. Unfortunately, he isn’t quick enough to get a good look for himself very often, and he isn’t strong or athletic enough to make good things happen often in other areas. He played 20 minutes against Rutgers in their First Round NCAA Tournament loss, managing to go 1 for 3 from the field, and that was after scoring 5 points in 24 minutes in a humiliating ACC Tournament loss to a Miami team with six scholarship players. At no point was playing a larger lineup considered, despite the fact that Hunter Tyson, Aamir Simms, Jonathan Baehre, and Olivier-Maxence Prosper all have perimeter skills and were much more likely to make good things happen defensively and on the boards. Boo to that, I guess is what I’m saying. I think I understand why some people left. For anyone that is a big Alex Hemenway fan, don’t worry; Clemson will have to play three guards at all times this year. Unfortunately, none of those guards are really physical enough to compete on the boards and defend tradition small forwards as well as Clyde Trapp, so defense and rebounding are going to take a hit. At 6-4, 220 pounds, South Florida transfer David Collins (12.5 ppg., 37.3% 3pt.) would be the most capable of filling that role, but he didn’t rebound that well in the AAC. He also had an issue with turnovers, but he should benefit from being moved off the ball. Finally, Chase Hunter didn’t do much beyond playing solid on the ball defense last season, but he will likely see his playing time return to the 20 minutes or so he played as a freshman. It would help if he could reacquire the confidence he had then.
Even though his minutes didn’t necessarily reflect it, Hunter Tyson took a big step forward as a junior. Tyson (7.5 ppg., 4.2 rpg. in 16.7 mpg., 43.1% 3pt.) began to assert himself on the boards and found confidence in his perimeter shooting stroke, leading the team in both rebounds per minute and three point shooting percentage. The 6-8 senior should get all the minutes he can handle, and he could emerge as the best player on the team. At center, P.J. Hall is the last man standing. With no real offseason to prepare for his freshman year and his minutes limited behind Simms, Hall didn’t receive many opportunities last year, and when he did, he had a tendency to quickly get into foul trouble. However, there were a few occasions where he flashed the potential that made him a top 60 recruit last year; at 6-10, he’s big, tough, agile, and skilled, and if he keeps the fouls under control he should have a great sophomore year with plenty of minutes. A full offseason should help him develop discipline. Unless three star freshman Ian Schieffelin is ready to contribute, the only real frontcourt depth will come from Youngstown St. transfer Naz Bohannan, who should fill a role similar to that of Aamir Simms. At 6-6, he’ll be somewhat undersized, but he’s a veteran that, like Simms, will compete on the offensive and defensive boards, score in the post, and find the open man, and he has the mobility and strength to guard multiple positions. Unlike Simms, however, Bohannan (16.5 ppg., 8.2 rpg., 3.2 apg. in the Horizon League) won’t be blocking shots or hitting threes.
Despite their overall success, Clemson didn’t really excel statistically at either end of the court last season beyond a respectable field goal percentage defense (85th). This season, defense and rebounding are certain to take a hit without the length and athleticism of Trapp, Simms, Baehre, and Prosper. Offensively, Brownell’s offense doesn’t generate many assists, so the ability of Simms and Trapp to create for themselves and others will be missed. Offensive efficiency could become an issue. With the relative ease of transferring under the NCAA’s new rules, inconsistent minutes, questionable decisions about starters, and the existence of doghouses aren’t going to fly outside of a few elite programs, and Clemson basketball isn’t one of those. Brad Brownell hasn’t failed to take Clemson to a postseason that was actually held for five years, but it will be difficult to keep that streak alive in 2022.
2020-2021: 10-12, 6-10 in the ACC (12th)
Departures: Justin Champagnie (18.0 ppg., 11.1 rpg., 1.3 bpg.) entered the NBA Draft; Xavier Johnson (14.2 ppg., 3.4 rpg., 5.7 apg.) transferred to Indiana, Au’Diese Toney (14.4 ppg., 5.9 rpg.) transferred to Arkansas, Abdoul Karim Coulibaly (5.2 ppg., 3.9 rpg.) transferred to St. Bonaventure, Terrell Brown transferred to San Diego, and Gerald Drumgoole transferred to Albany
Major Additions: 6-4 Texas Tech transfer Jamarius Burton, 6-9 Stony Brook transfer Mouhamadou Gueye, 6-7 Oakland transfer Daniel Oladapo (12.9 ppg., 8.8 rpg.)
Preseason Projection: 13th in the ACC; Possible lame-duck season for Jeff Capel
As has become the pattern under Jeff Capel, Pittsburgh started last season seeming to have turned things around with an 8-2 start that included a 4-1 mark in the ACC before Lucy (Peanuts, anyone?) somehow managed to take control of the second half. Not only did the team finish 2-10 over their last 12 games, but two key players, Xavier Johnson and Au’Diese Toney, actually jumped ship before the season was completely over. The Panther’s then lost their best player to the NBA Draft, and, after failing to land any high profile recruiting targets, Capel was left to patch together a roster as best he could through the transfer portal.
The departures of Johnson and Toney left freshman Femi Odukale and transfer Nike Sibande to man the ship in the backcourt, and the pair managed to acquit themselves relatively well over the last five games. Odukale, a 6-5 point guard, put up 13.6 points, 4 rebounds, and 3.2 assists while hitting 5 of 8 from 3 over those five games, while the 6-4 Sibande managed 15 points and 6.2 rebounds while shooting 48% from 3. Odukale should only get better as a rising sophomore that hasn’t experienced a full offseason, while Sibande would be a huge boost if he could continue to put up similar numbers as a senior taking a fifth year. It is entirely possible that the pair could equal the production of Johnson and Toney, but exceeding it this season seems unlikely. Capel’s most promising offseason addition might be Jamarius Burton, who frankly was a very good basketball player at Wichita St. (10.3 ppg., 3.5 rpg. 3.4 apg., 38.1% 3pt. in 2019-2020) before joining the mass exodus away from a mercurial Gregg Marshall and getting buried in the crowded depth chart at Texas Tech. At 6-4, 205 pounds, Burton is a strong and athletic guard that can make good things happen at both ends of the floor, and he has proven that he can be efficient offensively in the right situation. If he can regain the confidence he had with the Shockers, he would be a likely starter. College basketball’s worst case of an early entrant being hurt by the lack of a preseason may have been William Jeffress, who was still considered a top 75 recruit last season after reclassifying. Jeffress wasn’t old enough to vote in last year’s election but ended up playing significant minutes for the Panthers anyway, and the results were less than encouraging. Considering how bad his shooting percentages ended up being (22.8% overall and 15.0% 3pt.) and his overall potential, he should easily be Pitt’s most improved player; the differences should be night and day with a full offseason and a year to add strength to what was a 6-7, 205 pound frame. While Ithiel Horton (8.9 ppg., 38.1% 3pt.) isn’t a tremendous athlete, he will continue to provide a consistent perimeter threat.
Another early entrant, John Hugley, had a rough freshman year as well, although his biggest problems were off the court. On the court, Hugley is a high motor space eater in the paint at 6-9, 240 pounds; he was still considered a top 50 prospect after transferring, and he was second only to Champagnie in per minute rebounding last season (4.3 rpg. in 14.9 rpg.). Pittsburgh had an outstanding year rebounding the basketball (35th in rebounding margin) because of Champagnie’s dominance; Hugley will be the player most responsible for picking up the slack, and he should be more effective as a post scorer as a sophomore. Stony Brook transfer Mouhamadou Gueye (9.7 ppg., 7.1 rpg., 3.1 bpg., 34.5% 3pt.) will actually be taking over for Champagnie as the team’s stretch four, and that particular change will be noticeable. At 6-9, 210 pounds, Gueye’s 7.1 rebounds per game from last season won’t hold up in the ACC, although his off the ball shotblocking will provide rim protection that Hugley doesn’t. The pair should at least compliment one another well. Noah Collier, a 6-8 4 star recruit last year, is another player that could benefit significantly from a full offseason and time in the weight room. If he’s ready, Collier could help replace some of the rebounding and post scoring lost with Champagnie’s departure. Max Amadasun saw all of 12 minutes of playing time as a freshman, but he has potential as a rebounder and shot blocker, and at 6-10, 230 he will be the largest option available to Capel. Finally, transfer Daniel Oladipo (12.9 ppg., 8.8 rpg.) posted gaudy rebounding numbers at Oakland, but that stat was heavily padded because he played in the Horizon League for the fastest paced offense in the country and his team shot the ball very poorly last season (more misses equals more rebounding opportunities). Without a three point shot, it’s doubtful he’ll provide much at either end of the floor in the ACC.
While there haven’t been any NCAA violations for Pittsburgh under Jeff Capel, things seem to be falling apart in much the same way as they did at Oklahoma. At best, this team might be able to tread water; Champagnie’s loss will hurt on the boards, while Odukale doesn’t seem to be quite the facilitator that Johnson was and Champagnie was more capable of creating his own shot than anyone on the current roster, so offensive efficiency is also likely to take a hit. Champagnie was Capel’s biggest triumph, and at times he was so obviously an NBA player playing against kids that his departure seemed like a foregone conclusion. Otherwise, Capel has managed to alienate his best players, specifically Johnson, Toney, and Trey McGowens. The return of John Hugley from suspension and the addition of a pair of competitive transfers should allow the team to remain competitive, but, as should have been expected before Capel was hired, recruiting hasn’t remained consistent, and it seems unlikely that the Panthers will accomplish much more than the 6 ACC wins they have managed in each of the last two years. Recruiting failures, untimely departures, and particularly late season collapses would be obvious red flags for any program, and without some type of major positive development Jeff Capel is likely running out of chances in Pittsburgh.
Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets
2020-2021: 17-9, 11-6 in the ACC (4th); lost to Loyola-Chicago in the 1st round of the NCAA Tournament
Departures: Moses Wright (17.4 ppg., 8.0 rpg., 1.5 spg., 1.6 bpg., 41.4% 3pt.) and Jose Alvarado (15.2 ppg., 3.5 rpg., 4.1 apg., 2.8 spg., 39% 3pt.) entered the NBA Draft
Seniors taking an extra year: Jordan Usher, Bubba Parham
Major Additions: 6-1 Mississippi State transfer Deivon Smith, 6-6 top 50 recruit Dallan Coleman, 6-5 top 90 recruit Miles Kelly, and 6-6 4 star recruit Jalon Moore
Preseason Projection: 14th in the ACC
Last season was Georgia Tech’s best under Josh Pastner, and it included the program’s first ACC Tournament Championship since 1993 before ending in the first round of the NCAA Tournament. Unfortunately, the team now loses two All-ACC players to the NBA, and that includes the reigning ACC Player of the Year (Wright) and Defensive Player of the Year (Alvarado).
In addition to his defensive accomplishments, Jose Alvarado was tremendously efficient offensively as a senior, helping lead the Yellow Jackets to what was easily their best offensive performance under Pastner (Georgia Tech finished 27th in overall field goal percentage and 17th in assist to turnover ratio, both of which have been problem areas in the past). Those numbers seem likely to fall back to earth without Alvarado and Wright. Bubba Parham returns for a fifth year of eligibility and has at least avoided turnovers, but for the most part has been little more than a passable reserve since transferring from VMI. Junior Kyle Sturdivant was reasonably productive in limited minutes after transferring from USC and may have a higher ceiling than Parham, but he’s played exclusively off the ball. Neither player has Alvarado’s quickness or tenacity, and neither can pressure the ball or run the offensively as effectively. Mississippi St. transfer Deivon Smith, a former top 70 recruit, has the potential to eventually do both, but he’s a work in progress shooting the basketball and may be a year or two away from being the player Alvarado was at the offensive end as a senior. The Yellow Jackets do have plenty of talent on the wings, led by what should be their best player in senior Michael Devoe. Devoe (15.0 ppg., 4.3 rpg., 40% 3pt.) is an excellent scorer and was himself an All-ACC honorable mention; there may be an attempt to put the ball in his hands, but he clearly has a scorer’s mentality and can have turnover problems when left to facilitate the offense. Three highly regarded freshmen, Dallan Coleman, Miles Kelly, and Jalon Moore, will round out the perimeter rotation. Coleman, a 6-6 top 50 recruit, is an outstanding perimeter shooter with a well developed all around game; he could emerge as the team’s second best player and second leading scorer. Kelly, a 6-5 four star recruit, will provide another long range weapon, although his need to add strength may limit what he can do as a freshman. Moore, a 6-6 4 star recruit, could help offensively as well, but more importantly he’s a high motor athlete that should be helpful defending both on the perimeter and in the post. He could see time as a stretch 4 in smaller lineups.
Jordan Usher will also be taking advantage of the extra year of eligibility. At 6-7, Usher (11.6 ppg., 4.2 rpg., 1.6 spg.) is a stretch four that struggles with the stretch part and doesn’t really rebound well enough for the position, but he is a great athlete that began to assert himself defensively and by attacking the rim offensively last season. The Yellow Jackets need him to rebound better. Senior Khalid Moore served as the team’s primary frontcourt reserve by default last season; while he uses his length and athleticism effectively at the defensive end, he still seems lost on offense and has rarely shown flashed of what made him a well regarded point guard prospect coming out of high school. If he can’t progress, he may lose his playing time to one of the freshmen. Georgia Tech’s biggest problem is the hole in the middle created by Wright; rim protection has been a key to Georgia Tech’s defense during Pastnor’s tenure thanks to Ben Lammers, James Banks, and Moses Wright, and neither Saba Gigiberia or Rodney Howard has shown much to be optimistic about to this point. That being said, player development has been excellent under Pastner, and both players would have benefited from a full offseason. Gigiberia was a top 80 recruit coming out of high school, and at 7-1 he has long arms and perimeter skills including the ability to stretch the floor. He obviously has potential, but defense and rebounding will be the issues. Howard is a solid athlete at 6-10, but he really hasn’t done much beyond blocking the occasional shot in the playing time he’s been given at both Georgia and Georgia Tech. Jordan Meka, a 6-8 sophomore that saw his freshman year end after one game due to back surgery, will be in the mix as well; while he won’t provide much offensively, he’s the best rebounder and shotblocker of the group, and those are really the skills the Yellow Jackets need the most from the position. Despite being just 6-7, 200 pounds, Khalid Moore was essentially the team’s backup at center for much of last season (Wright averaged 35.3 minutes per game); hopefully, that won’t be necessary this year.
Josh Pastner has assembled plenty of talent on the wings and Georgia Tech will be competitive 2 through 4, but Alvarado and Wright keyed the Yellow Jackets’ attack at both ends of the floor, and there is no clear replacement for Wright in the post. Alvarado’s abilities to create for himself and others off the dribble and to hit big shots and Wright’s skill as a low post scorer will be missed, so offensive efficiency is going to take a hit. The bigger issue will be at the defensive end; before last season, defense had been Georgia Tech’s strength under Pastner, but they were actually terrible last year, finishing 278th in field goal percentage defense, 315th in 3pt. percentage defense, and 294th in rebounding margin, and that was with the conference Defensive Player of the Year and a strong effort from Wright playing out of position. Unless there is a very pleasant surprise at center, things could actually get ugly for the Yellow Jackets, and last season’s ACC Tournament victory might seem very far away by the end of the year.
Boston College Eagles
2020-2021: 4-16, 2-11 in the ACC (15th)
Departures: Steffon Mitchell (9.1 ppg., 7.3 rpg.) entered the NBA Draft; Jay Heath (14.5 ppg., 35.0% 3pt.) transferred to Arizona State, CJ Felder (9.7 ppg., 5.9 rpg., 2.2 bpg.) transferred to Florida, Wynston Tabbs (13.3 ppg., 39.7% 3pt.) transferred to East Carolina, Rich Kelly (11.0 ppg., 37.2% 3pt.) transferred to UMass, and Kamari Williams transferred to Miami (Ohio); Luka Kraljevic also entered the transfer portal
Seniors taking an extra year: James Karnik and Fred Scott
Major Additions: 6-2 College of Charleston transfer Brevin Galloway, 4 star recruit Gianni Thompson, 6-9 Drexel transfer T.J. Bickerstaff, 7-0 Mississippi St. transfer Quinten Post, and 6-1 junior college transfer Jaeden Zackery
Preseason Projection: 15th in the ACC
After allowing Jim Christian to remain as head coach for at least one year longer than they should have, Boston College finally made a coaching change in mid February. The in-season firing wasn’t the result of any violations that occurred under Christian, but instead reflects the new reality that any coaching change can now result in an entire roster entering the transfer portal and must therefore be done as quickly as possible. Still, last year marked the ninth time the program has finished with a losing record in the eleven years since the firing of Al Skinner, a move that appears more ridiculous with every passing season (just as a reminder, Skinner took the Eagles to the NCAA Tournament in seven of his last ten years as coach). The program will now be taken over by former College of Charleston coach Earl Grant, who despite the proactive in-season coaching change will be facing an almost complete rebuild.
Boston College does still feature a former top 40 recruit in senior Makai Ashton-Langford. While Ashton-Langford (9.6 ppg., 3.2 apg., 1.7 spg.) continued to struggle shooting the basketball last season, his assist to turnover ratio did improve and he became a threat to create turnovers defensively. The rest of the backcourt minutes will need to come from two transfers. Brevin Galloway followed Grant from Charleston, where he had proven himself as a capable scorer even against major conference competition after scoring 15 points against North Carolina in last season’s opener. Galloway (15.0 ppg., 41.9% 3pt.) was also an all conference defensive player as a junior when he averaged 2.2 steals per game. He might have emerged as the Eagles best player, but he will still be recovering from an ACL tear that ended his season in December and may not completely be himself this year. Jaeden Zackery, a third team Junior College All-American, will also be in the mix. While he shot the ball and defended well and was reasonably efficient as a juco point guard, junior college basketball is a step below small conference Division I play and Zackery wasn’t considered one of the top prospects, so it’s even less certain what he will be able to provide an ACC team. Makai’s brother Demarr Langford, himself a top 90 recruit last season, struggled with offensive efficiency as a freshman. At 6-5, Langford (6.7 ppg., 4.2 rpg.) will be the likely starter at small forward; he should benefit from his first complete offseason. There isn’t much athleticism remaining on the Boston College roster, so the progress of the Langford brothers will suddenly become much more important. 6-9 Drexel transfer T.J. Bickerstaff could see time at both forward spots. Bickerstaff (10.2 ppg., 5.2 rpg.) improved significantly as a sophomore, but he hasn’t extended his range to the 3 point line and will need to continue to add weight if he’s going to compete in the paint in the ACC.
Two seniors that were transfers a year ago are taking advantage of the extra year of availability and will be the likely starters in the frontcourt. James Karnik (6.8 ppg., 5.4 rpg.) is a well conditioned 6-9 veteran that will compete on the boards, but he doesn’t have the length or athletic ability to be an efficient post scorer in the ACC. Fred Scott (7.6 ppg., 3.9 rpg., 40.0% 3pt.) is limited athletically as well, but he is a 6-8 veteran that can effectively stretch the floor. He should see more opportunities to shoot the basketball this season. Gianni Thompson, a four star recruit, has more upside than the seniors as a more athletic stretch four, but he will need to add weight to what was a 6-8, 205 pound frame to compete in the paint in the ACC. 7-0 transfer Quinten Post saw limited opportunities at Mississippi State, but he posted respectable per minute rebounding and shot blocking numbers in the SEC and could eventually challenge Karnik for a starting sport.
Earl Grant produced diminishing returns at the College of Charleston over the last two seasons (although Galloway’s injury clearly had an impact last season), and he will now be taking over a team that is as close to starting from scratch as a major conference program can be. Even the two successful teams Grant produced at Charleston failed to excel statistically at either end of the floor, and this one will face a talent deficit in ACC play. The current Eagles roster may not have a single player that would be able to earn a spot in Notre Dame’s rotation this season, and the consistent mediocrity of the programsince Skinner's firing makes quick improvement through recruiting unlikely. The short term future of the Boston College men’s basketball program doesn’t exactly seem bright.At best, this year’s Eagles may have enough talent to be competitive against what should be a relatively light non-conference schedule, and it will take hot shooting versus cold opponents to manage any wins in the ACC.