Top 10 Greatest Men's Tennis Players of All Time

Updated on April 4, 2019
bdegiulio profile image

Bill has had a lifelong passion for the game of tennis from his days as a competitive youth player to now following the world's top players.

International Tennis Hall of Fame: Newport, RI

The International Tennis Hall of Fame and Museum
The International Tennis Hall of Fame and Museum | Source

I grew up playing tennis in the 1970s, which was a great time for the sport of tennis. It was then that tennis really became more of a mainstream sport than a sport for the privileged, especially here in the United States. With the likes of Jimmy Connors, Bjorn Borg, John McEnroe, Chris Evert, and others, there were plenty of personalities to fuel the rivalries that took place on and off the court. Since that time, many great players have come and gone. Because it is difficult to compare players of different eras in any sport due to technology changes and higher fitness standards, selecting the greatest player ever can be a difficult and very subjective task.

Despite the challenge, here is my list of the ten greatest male tennis players of the Open Era - 1968 to present. I have actually included eleven players here with two greats tied for the tenth position.

10. Ken Rosewall

Ken Rosewall
Ken Rosewall | Source
  • Born: November 2, 1934
    Sydney, Australia
  • Resides: Sydney, Australia
  • Turned pro: 1957
  • Retired: 1980
  • Career prize money: $1,602,700
  • 133 career titles
  • 8 Grand Slam Singles Titles: 4 Australian, 2 French, 2 US Open
  • 15 Pro Majors: 2 US Pro, 5 Wembley Pro, 8 French Pro
  • Inducted into Tennis Hall of Fame: 1980

With a long career that included both the pre and post Open Era, Ken Rosewall certainly deserves a place among the all-time greats of tennis. His eight Grand Slam titles combined with 15 Major Championships undoubtedly qualifies Rosewall a place in tennis immortality. With a career that started in the early 1950s and ended with his retirement in 1980, the quick and agile Aussie was renowned for his backhand and crisp and accurate volleying. His last Grand Slam title came at the 1972 Australian Open at the age of 37, still a record for the oldest Grand Slam winner.

I watched Ken Rosewall play during the latter part of his career and at the time probably did not realize the greatness I was watching. To compete at his age with the next generation of tennis greats speaks volumes to his conditioning and mental toughness. I am placing him in the tenth position along with Andre Agassi as I feel that both players are worthy of a top ten.

10. Andre Agassi

Andre Agassi
Andre Agassi | Source
  • Born: April 29, 1970
    Las Vegas, Nevada
  • Resides: Las Vegas, Nevada
  • Turned pro: 1986
  • Retired: 2006
  • Career prize money: $31,152,975
  • 61 career titles
  • 8 Grand Slam Singles Titles: 4 Australian, 1 French, 2 US Open, 1 Wimbledon
  • Olympic Gold Medalist 1996
  • Inducted into Tennis Hall of Fame: 2011

Who can forget the young, brash, long-haired Andre Agassi when he first arrived on the tennis scene in the late 1980s? I have to admit that at first I was put off by his seemingly "rock star" looks and attitude. But something happened along the way, and by the time he finished his 20-year career, I was not only a fan but I had also come to respect him as a great player and spokesman for the game. With those killer ground strokes and returns of serve, no top-10 list would be complete without Andre Agassi.

Off the court, Agassi has proven to be a champion as well. There may be no athlete out there who does more for their community than Agassi and his wife, tennis legend Steffi Graf.

9. John McEnroe

John McEnroe
John McEnroe | Source
  • Born: February 16, 1959
    Wiesbaden, West Germany
  • Resides: New York City
  • Turned pro: 1978
  • Retired: 1992
  • Career prize money: $12,547,797
  • 105 career titles
  • 7 Grand Slam Singles Titles: 3 Wimbledon, 4 US Open
  • Inducted into Tennis Hall of Fame: 1999

John McEnroe: What do we do about Johnny Mac? Well, for starters we include him on our list of all-time greats. When it came to hard courts, fast surfaces, and creative shot-making, there may have been no one better.

His fiery attitude and occasional bad-boy behavior made tennis fans either hate him or love him. Underneath was a highly competitive athlete who hated to lose and sometimes let his emotions get the best of him.

Who can forget his epic battles with rival Jimmy Connors and his five-set loss to Bjorn Borg in the 1980 Wimbledon final, one of the greatest matches in Wimbledon history?

8. Jimmy Connors

Jimmy Connors
Jimmy Connors | Source
  • Born: September 2, 1952
    East St. Louis, Illinois
  • Resides: Santa Barbara, CA
  • Turned pro: 1972
  • Retired: 1996
  • Career prize money: $8,641,040
  • 147 career titles
  • 8 Grand Slam Singles Titles: 1 Australian, 2 Wimbledon, 5 US Open
  • Inducted into Tennis Hall of Fame: 1998

No one dominated tennis more during the mid-1970s than Jimmy Connors. In 1974 alone, Connors had a staggering 99-4 record and won the three Grand Slam tournaments that he entered. Connors was banned from playing in the French Open in 1974 due to his association with World Team Tennis, and this prevented him from a possible Grand Slam sweep. Despite peaking in the 1970s, Connors had a long and impressive tennis career, retiring in 1996. Connors still holds the record for ATP tour titles with 109.

7. Ivan Lendl

Ivan Lendl
Ivan Lendl | Source
  • Born: March 7, 1960
    Ostrava, Czechoslovakia
  • Resides: Goshen, Connecticut
  • Turned pro: 1978
  • Retired: 1994
  • Career prize money: $21,262,417
  • 144 career titles
  • 8 Grand Slam Singles Titles: 2 Australian, 3 French, 3 US Open
  • Inducted into Tennis Hall of Fame: 2001

The quiet and stoic Czech with the big serve was the most dominant player of the 1980s. Lendl wore down his opponents with his powerful ground strokes, topspin forehand, and incredible level of conditioning. He was the world’s top-ranked player for four years, and held the number one ranking in the world for 270 weeks, a record in that day. In contrast to many of his more outspoken peers, Lendl was known for letting his game do his talking.

6. Bjorn Borg

Bjorn Borg
Bjorn Borg | Source
  • Born: June 6, 1956
    Sodertalje, Stockholm County, Sweden
  • Resides: Stockholm, Sweden
  • Turned pro: 1973
  • Retired: 1983
  • Career prize money: $3,655,751
  • 101 career titles
  • 11 Grand Slam Singles Titles: 6 French, 5 Wimbledon
  • Inducted into Tennis Hall of Fame: 1987

What was not to love about the long-haired, blonde Swede with the killer ground game? With ice water in his veins, the quiet Borg dominated tennis in the late 1970s and had some memorable matches with the likes of John McEnroe and Jimmy Connors. Borg dominated Wimbledon, winning the title five consecutive years from 1976 to 1980.

Despite his relatively brief career (he retired in 1983 at the age of 26), Borg won 11 Grand Slam titles, all at Wimbledon and the French Open. Borg was the first player of the modern era to win more than 10 majors. In my book Bjorn Borg could have been a top five all-time had he continued to play and not retired while seemingly in the prime of his career.

5. Pete Sampras

Pete Sampras
Pete Sampras | Source

Born: August 12, 1971
Potomac, Maryland

  • Resides: Lake Sherwood, California
  • Turned pro: 1988
  • Retired 2002
  • Career prize money: $43,280,489
  • 64 career titles
  • 14 Grand Slam Singles Titles: 2 Australian, 7 Wimbledon, 5 US Open
  • Inducted into Tennis Hall of Fame: 2007

Pete's place in tennis history is difficult to judge as he only won three of the four Grand Slam events over the course of his career. Clearly more comfortable on hard courts and grass how do we decide one's place when they dominate on one surface and struggle on another. When Pete retired in 2002, he was considered to be the best player of all-time although some would dispute this. He was number one in the world rankings for six consecutive years and his 14 Grand Slam titles was a record at the time. Who can forget his epic battles with Andre Agassi that made the 1990s a great decade for tennis? Pete went out on top when he won the 2002 US Open, his last Grand Slam tournament. But, without a French Open title, or even a final, how do we decide where he belongs in the list of best ever. For now I think he comes in at the number five spot.

4. Rod Laver

Rod Laver
Rod Laver | Source
  • Born: August 8, 1938
    Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia
  • Resides: Carlsbad, California
  • Turned pro: 1962
  • Retired 1979
  • Career prize money: $1,565,413
  • 200 career titles
  • 11 Grand Slam Singles Titles: 3 Australian, 2 French, 2 US Open, 4 Wimbledon
  • 9 Pro Slam Singles Titles: 3 US Pro, 4 Wembley Pro, 1 French Pro, 1 Wimbledon Pro
  • Inducted into Tennis Hall of Fame: 1981

It’s difficult to assess how Rod Laver would have fared against the players of today, but I suspect the redheaded Aussie would have done just fine. It’s hard to argue with the “Rockets” record. He was ranked number one in the world for seven straight years (1964 – 1970) and has more career titles (200) than anyone in the history of the game.

He is the only player to have twice won the Grand Slam, doing it once as an amateur in 1962 and again as a pro in 1969. If Laver was not excluded from the Grand Slam tournaments during a five-year period in the mid-1960s, who knows how many he would have won. During this time period, the pre-open era, the Grand Slam tournaments were for amateurs only. The “open era” in tennis did not begin until 1968, when professionals were finally allowed to compete in the Grand Slam events. Given that Laver was ranked number one in the world during this five-year period, it’s likely he would have won many more Grand Slam titles.

3. Novak Djokovic

Novak Djokovic
Novak Djokovic | Source
  • Born: May 22, 1987
    Belgrade, Serbia
  • Resides: Monte Carlo, Monaco
  • Turned pro: 2003
  • Career prize money: $125,847,879
  • 73 career titles
  • 15 Grand Slam Singles Titles: 7 Australian, 4 Wimbledon, 3 US Open, 1 French Open
  • Current active player

Placing Novak Djokovic on this list was an easy decision, but where to place him was not. At 31 years of age and in the late prime years of his career, Djokovic is clearly the best player in the world at the moment and has the potential to win many more Grand Slam titles. With 15 Grand Slam titles already under his belt, he certainly has the potential to surpass Federer’s total of 20. But, in the highly competitive world of tennis, he could also succumb to injury and miss out on some of his best years, so the jury is still out on his ultimate place in tennis history.

Based on his body of work to date, he has certainly made the case that he is deserving of a top three all-time. With his 2016 French Open title, Djokovic became the eight-man to secure a career Grand Slam. 2017 was not a good year for Djokovic and the start to the 2018 season was difficult as he continued to recover from an elbow injury and struggled to find his form. Wimbledon 2018 proved to be the turning point as he defeated Rafael Nadal in a thrilling five-set match in the semi-finals and cruised home in the finals to take the title. His dominating performance at the 2018 US Open and the 2019 Australian Open makes it clear that Djokovic is the best player in the world at the moment.

2. Rafael Nadal

Rafael Nadal
Rafael Nadal | Source
  • Born: June 3, 1986
    Manacor, Majorca, Balearic Islands, Spain
  • Resides: Manacor, Majorca, Balearic Islands, Spain
  • Turned pro: 2001
  • Career prize money: $103,251,975
  • 80 career titles
  • 17 Grand Slam Singles Titles: 1 Australian, 11 French, 3 US Open, 2 Wimbledon
  • 2008 Olympic Gold Medalist - Beijing Summer Olympics
  • Current active player

Were it not for the recurring tendinitis in his knees, and wrist injuries, Rafael Nadal may well have a few more Grand Slam titles to his already impressive resume. At 32 years of age, the fiery Spaniard, known as Rafa and “The King of Clay,” already has 17 Grand Slam titles and certainly has the potential to catch Roger Federer. Rafael is regarded as the greatest clay court player of all-time, although fans of Bjorn Borg may dispute this claim. His record 11th French Open title in 2018 certainly makes it difficult to imagine anyone being better on clay.

Entering the 2018 season, Rafa’s hip injury continued to plague him and was clearly a factor in his quarterfinal fifth set retirement to Marin Cilic. He rebounded nicely to win his record 11th French Open, a surface he clearly is at home on. While it is difficult to draw comparisons of players from different generations I think Nadal has proven that he deserves to be considered among the best to ever grace the courts, and as such we have elevated his all-time ranking to number two.

1. Roger Federer

Roger Federer
Roger Federer | Source
  • Born: August 8, 1981
    Basel, Switzerland
  • Resides: Wollerau, Switzerland and Dubai, UAE
  • Turned pro: 1998
  • Career prize money: $120,514,916
  • 101 career titles
  • 20 Grand Slam Singles Titles: 6 Australian, 1 French, 5 US Open, 8 Wimbledon
  • Current active player

It’s hard not to select Roger Federer as the greatest of all time. His record 20 Grand Slam titles speak for themselves, and even at the age of 37, he is still winning and competing at the highest levels. His 310 weeks ranked as number one in the world is an open-era record. From 2004 to 2008, Federer went 237 consecutive weeks being ranked number one in the world, a record that may never be surpassed. Even though younger players are now finding a way to beat him, his consistently high level of play over his twenty-year career is a testament to his conditioning and ability. Winning the 2018 Australian Open after his outstanding 2017 season that saw him win Wimbledon and the Australian Open prove without a doubt that Roger Federer is indeed the greatest of all-time. Barring injury, Roger will continue to be a force to be reckoned with for who knows how long? However, his round of 16 loss at the 2018 US Open and the 2019 Australian Open has proven that nothing lasts forever and begs the question, has age finally caught up to Roger Federer?

After 6 years and almost 125,000 votes it’s time to refresh our list of players.

Who is the greatest men’s tennis player of the Open Era?

See results

Thank you to everyone for voting over the last 6 years (2013 - 2018). We are closing this poll in lieu of the newly expanded list of players.

Who do you think is the greatest men's tennis player of all-time?

  • 1% John McEnroe
  • 9% Novak Djokovic
  • 1% Andre Agassi
  • 0% Jimmy Connors
  • 0% Ivan Lendl
  • 14% Rafael Nadal
  • 3% Bjorn Borg
  • 2% Rod Laver
  • 2% Pete Sampras
  • 67% Roger Federer
124,807 people have voted in this poll.

This poll is now closed to voting.

Questions & Answers

  • How do you comment on the fact that Djokovic has a better score H2H vs. Nadal and vs. Federer? And Fed has a negative score vs. two of his greatest opponents? Few grand slams to Djokovic and few more wins vs. Fed and Nadal (so the score can be even better), and for me, he is the goat with no doubt.

    The head to head between the three players is very close. You have to take into consideration the playing surface and also their age. Federer is the oldest by almost five years, so obviously you would expect Nadal and Djokovic to have an advantage, especially at this point in their careers. Likewise, Nadal excels on clay so he would have a distinct advantage when playing on this surface.

  • Why don’t you take into account that almost half of the Federer grand slams were in the first years, before Nadal, Djokovic, etc?

    I did take that into account, just like I took into account that most of Nadal’s Grand Slam titles have come on clay, and Djokovic has not won a Grand Slam title since 2016. If you take their entire body of work into account, I think most ratings will have Federer as the greatest of all-time.

  • If Federer is the greatest men's tennis player, why was he never able to beat Nadal on the clay?

    Clay is just one surface, if you take that out of the picture the advantage goes to Federer. Consider also that Nadal is five years younger than Federer.

  • Who is the best men's tennis player on clay?

    I think without a doubt that Rafael Nadal is the best player to ever play on clay. Certainly his 11 French Open titles should be enough to make this perfectly clear.

  • What do you think about the 1000 masters series complete by Novak? is this achievement worth the upgrade on the list?

    Following completion of the U.S. Open, I plan on updating both the men’s and women’s top 10. Completing the Masters 1000 Slam is quite a feat, and Novak certainly seems to be back in top form.

© 2013 Bill De Giulio

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment
    • profile image

      Ayokunle 

      5 weeks ago

      It is only a matter of time before Djokovic jumps to number 1 on this list. I'll be waiting till that day.

      Presently, I think Novak should be in the 2nd position. He broke the duopoly of Federer and Nadal, having a winning record over both and is the only player in the world to have the *Golden Masters*.

    • bdegiulio profile imageAUTHOR

      Bill De Giulio 

      2 months ago from Massachusetts

      Matt who?

    • profile image

      Bobby 

      2 months ago

      It’s very wrong to comment who is the GOAT now,while current best 3 players are still playing!

      So wrong!

      So many of you are desperate to push your favorite to the pole position yeah?

      Let’s wait until they are finished with tennis then we will see Who is the GOAT!

    • profile image

      Piterpol83 

      2 months ago

      My top ten all time updated is:

      1. Roger Federer: more Majors Open era (20), more weeks #1, 10 finals Grand Slams streak.

      2. Rod Laver: two calendar Grand Slams, 200 titles récord all time, 19 majors.

      3. Ken Rosewall: more majors all time (23)

      4. Rafael Nadal: great player clay court all time, 17 majors.

      5. Novak Djokovic: récord 4 Grand Slams consecutives in three surface, winner all masters series, 15 majors.

      6. Pete Sampras: six years consecutives end #1, 14 majors

      7. Bill Tilden: 15 majors, best player first half century XX.

      8. Bjorn Borg: record % winner in era Open and Grand Slams.

      9. Pancho Gonzales: more years ending #1 all time.

      10. Ivan Lendl: 18 finals consecutives tournament.

      Jimmy Connors: more titles and wins in era Open.

      11 to 100 all time:

      11. Andre Agassi

      12. John Mcenroe

      13. Don Budge

      14. Tony Wilding

      15. Henry Cochet

      16. Fred Perry

      17. Hugh Doherty

      18. Boris Becker

      19. Stefan Edberg

      20. Andy Murray

      21. Mats Wilander

      22. John Newcombe

      23. Lew Hoad

      24. Rene Lacoste

      25. Jack Kramer

      26. Bobby Riggs

      27. Guillermo Vilas

      28. Illie Nastase

      29. Roy Emerson

      30. Williams Renshaw

      31. Elsworth Vines

      32. Arthur Ashe

      33. Jean Borotra

      34. Jaroslav Drobny

      35. Frank Sedgman

      36. Pancho Segura

      37. Tony Trabert

      38. Jim Courier

      39. Ernest Renshaw

      40. Lleyton Hewitt

      41. Andy Roddick

      42. Stan Smith

      43. Patrick Rafter

      44. Jack Crawford

      45. Yevgeni Káfelnikov

      46. Bill Johnston

      47. Joshua Pim

      48. Williams Larned

      49. Norman Brookes

      50. Hans Nuslein

      51. Gustavo Kuerten

      52. Wilfred Bedeley

      53. Richard Sears

      54. Karel Kozeluh

      55. Michael Stich

      56. Gottfried Von Cramm

      57. Marat Safin

      58. Thomas Muster

      59. Alex Olmedo

      60. Marcelo Ríos

      61. Neale Fraser

      62. Manolo Santana

      63. Maurice Mcloughlin

      64. Carlos Moyá

      65. Juan Carlos Ferrero

      66. Vitas Gerulaitis

      67. Andres Gimeno

      68. Ashley Cooper

      69. Richard Krajicek

      70. Stanislas Wawrinka

      71. Robert Wrenn

      72. Michael Chang

      73. Vic Seixas

      74. Arthur Gore

      75. Frank Parker

      76. Mal Anderson

      77. Jan Kodes

      78. Joshiah Ritchie

      79. Juan Martín Del Potro

      80. Jannik Noah

      81. Manuel Orantes

      82. David Ferrer

      83. Tom Okker

      84. Harold Salomon

      85. Adriam Quist

      86. Sergi Bruguera

      87. John Bromwich

      88. Tony Roche

      89. Alex Corretja

      90. Petr Korda

      91. Goran Ivanisevic

      92. Nicolai Davidenko

      93. David Nalbandian

      94. Roscoe Tanner

      95. Miroslav Mecir

      96. Marin Cilic

      97. Andres Gómez

      98. Jo Wilfred Tsonga

      99. Bunny Austin

      100. Butch Butcholz

    • profile image

      Levan 

      2 months ago

      Objectively, I guess, Roger Federer. Yet, I have voted for Borg still, for he is for me more enigmatic and inspiring, and he endowed tennis with an inimitable and most powerful charm.

    • profile image

      Desmond 

      2 months ago

      On current record, Roger is slightly ahead of Rafa and Novak. However, all 3 are still playing at the moment and therefore I feel the greatest of them is yet to be decided. On current form, Novak is playing better than Roger and Rafa. He is also the youngest of the 3. I don't see any outstanding player coming through from the new generation of players leaving Novak with a good chance to catch up with Roger.

    • bdegiulio profile imageAUTHOR

      Bill De Giulio 

      2 months ago from Massachusetts

      There is only 1 Grand Slam event on grass, Wimbledon.

    • profile image

      JayTipps 

      2 months ago

      Federer is lucky he plays 2 Grand slams on his favourite surface grass . Medal only plays 1 Grand slam on his favourite surface every year. Hence why Federer has won more Grand slams . End of chat

    • profile image

      Gonzalo Castro 

      2 months ago

      Jimmy Connors was very disrespectful towards other players. So, according to my professional standards Jimmy should not be considered as a great professional but mediocre. Similarly happens with other players as Novak Djokovic and Serena Williams. Professional conduct should also be taken into consideration when it comes to the final evaluation of a professional. That is why, besides great accomplishments on court, I believe Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal should be considered two of the best tennis players.

      Evaluating a tennis player it should also be considered the generations; tennis has changed in very many ways through time. Now days, tennis is totally different as it was 60 years ago. That is why Rod Laver could very well be the best tennis player ever; besides his unparalleled accomplishments, he was a remarkable inspirational sport man.

    • profile image

      John P 

      2 months ago

      People have to understand that the pro majors before the open era of 1968 were won by the best Tennis players. All pre 1968 pro majors should be of more value than the amateur majors. Laver, Rosewall and Pancho Gonzales would be 1,2 and 3 of all time. If these three played in the in the Australian open, French open, Wimbledon and the US open from 1963 to 1967 Roy Emerson would have only won 2 majors.

    • profile image

      Harry 

      2 months ago

      You keep saying that Nadal is dominant on clay and if that is excluded then Federers record is better. Why dont you say that if we take out Federer's best surface then Nadal is dominant. Sounds hypocritical

    • bdegiulio profile imageAUTHOR

      Bill De Giulio 

      2 months ago from Massachusetts

      Over 121,000 people have voted with Federer receiving 68% of the votes. Of course Nadal and Djokovic should be the better players now, Federer is 37 years old.

    • profile image

      Margaret Williams 

      2 months ago

      Imust be honest to say from reading all your comment you personally dont have the simplist idea of who is the GOAT. If Federer is the greatest why cant he beat Nadal on Clay when in return Nadal had beaten him on all is favourite surfaces and more than ever Nadal injuries must be consider

    • profile image

      Gonzalo Castro 

      3 months ago

      Have you taken into consideration that Novak Djokovic could very well has cheated in finals by distracting the opponents by appearing sick? Novak did so in several matches against Rafa; it was very dispiriting. Fortunately, tennis players already know about this issue.

    • profile image

      Maciek P 

      3 months ago

      My Top 10 Greatest Men's Tennis Players of Open Era Times:

      1. Roger Federer - 20 GS titles, 98 titles overall, 6 tour finals, 310 weeks as top1. His h2h against Djokovic doesn't mean that much, I'm open for discussion in that matter. His h2h with Nadal could indeed be better and Nadal bested him on Wimbledon, while he never could beat Nadal on RG. But, he's much more consistent then Rafa, who still lacks a titles (obviously, only if he's comparing to Rgoer).

      2. Rafael Nadal - some kind of "nemesis" to GOAT (at this very moment, could be change in the future, as both of them are still active), second only to Roger in a number of GS titles. Finest clay-court player of all time, indeed the "King of Clay". Reach his first title and his "prime" ealier then either Roger or Novak. Will he became the GOAT? Will see.

      3. Novak Djokovic - Just as Roger is a master of every court's surface, as is Novak. Both would have much more RG titles if they wouldn't have the "King of Clay" in their times. To be honest, I wasn't sure if Novak shouldn't be even a top2 player. He couldn't be below top3, that was obvious to me (he's for sure in top4 of all times, but I counted only Open Era's feats). He has 3 less GS titles, but has more weeks on top1, better h2h with Rafa and 5 tour finals, while Rafa has 0. Perhaps he should be indeed a top2. Hard to tell.

      4. Pete Sampras - Before Roger, he had he greatest number of weeks that he spent as a ranking's leader. He has also as many slams as Novak. But, unlike Novak, he had never win a RG title, and for Novak it was even harder since he player in Nadal's clay era. But we have to be fair, his number of weeks as top1, his 14 GS titles places him above Borg. Perhaps if Borg's career would be longer...

      5. Bjorn Borg - .. yes, perhaps if only his career would be a bit longer...

      6. Ivan Lendl - was a top1 longer then Connors or McEnroe or Agassi (or Borg at that point), despite the fact, that Connors have longer career. Superior H2H to them (excluding Borg). That's enough, not by a big margin though.

      7. Jimmy Connors - more weeks as ranking leader to Agassi and McEnroe, more GS titles then McEnroe. But still, i'm not sure to be honest. Connors has never won RG title, while Agassi has all of them.

      8. Andre Agassi - as above. Not sure if he shouldn't be top7.

      9. John McEnroe - less GS titles then either Agassi or Connors, less weeks as top then Connors and - unlike Agassi - has never won either FO or AO.

      10. Stefan Edberg - another close one. Obvious contenders for #10 are Wilander and Becker. Looking at h2h I should place Becker here, looking at GS titles Wilander should be there. I placed Edberg here only becouse of his number of GS titles combined with a number of weeks as a ranking leader. Anyway, it's reasonable to put either Wilander or Bekcer here. Any of them would not be there if it would be a top10 of all times, since Laver is far greater then either of them; perhaps even all of them combine, basing on achivments.

      Short comment:

    • profile image

      todd saed 

      3 months ago

      Pancho Gonzalez beat Laver, at age forty, DOn Budge, Bobby RIggs, and VInes, probably Jack Kramer and BIll Tilden according to Kramer and Collins would be better than those listed

    • profile image

      nebosja 

      3 months ago

      This list is far better now. Last time I checked it... Novak was number 5. You can not be number 5 when you won 10+ grand slams vs top 2 players on this list (not to mention he has better h2h).

    • profile image

      Cristián M. 

      3 months ago

      I would mostly agree with this ranking, except for the presence of Pete Sampras. Sampras was one of the most boring tennis players I ever witnessed in my 49 years. Marcelo Rios should be in this list instead. Just my 2 cents

    • profile image

      James S 

      4 months ago

      Lol @Roy Shatzel . Federer is above Nadal because he is a far more consistent player with more slams and has a superior game in all assets except for heavy hitting.

    • profile image

      Todd Saed 

      4 months ago

      Pancho Gonzalez, Ellworth Vines, and Don BUdge were the greatest players, Pancho number one, BUd Collins and Jack Kramer say this, with TIlden, and Laver a close second, then McEnroe, Pancho counting longevity, best on a given day, serving, et al, eight world pro championships in a row, beat Laver, when age 41 made semis at Wimbledon, none have matched his serve speed, accuracy, and percentage combines, best forehand, lobbed, speed, pole axed overheads

    • profile image

      DHE 

      4 months ago

      They are all great but the list is too weighted to modern times. It would be like if you asked kids who was the greatest female performer in music history and they said Lady Gaga. Hard to compare eras.

    • profile image

      Fekadu 

      5 months ago

      For me player who can be won 2x every GS and 1000 masters is a GOAT. And player will win all the GS the same year.

    • profile image

      NICLAS 

      5 months ago

      Djokovic would have won more than 1 Roland Garos. He has the game for the clay... If he wasnt in Nadal era who is with no doubt the best clay player ever, he would have won 3 or more by now.

    • profile image

      Dreni 

      5 months ago

      Haha all crying because federer is number one instead of their favourite

    • profile image

      Roy Schaetzel 

      5 months ago

      Your basis for ranking is ridiculous. You fail to take into account that Federer and Djokovic won most of their GS's on hard courts and grass. Why do people assume that hard courts should be the basis of the judgement. You note that Sampras did not do well on clay, but you fail to note that Federer and Djokovic only won one GS on clay and that only when Nadal was not around. You suffer from the same ranking disease that most tennis people do - you judge without basis that clay court dominance should not really count.

    • profile image

      Duka 

      6 months ago

      Why you are always mentioning that Nadal and Novak has advantage compare to Federer in head to head because of years? Federer played against them when they were teenagers and he was in his prime. Than he was supposed to make advantage (and he did with Novak). Before 2011. Roger has 13:6. Now it is, as you said opposite story. I think that it come to balance and Novak and Rafa proved that they are better

    • profile image

      poop 

      6 months ago

      Look at the poll it isn't even close, you should really just argue for number 2.

      Who on earth thinks that playing the role of "brick wall" deserves a vote anyways?

    • profile image

      JayTipps 

      6 months ago

      Hasn't Federer + Nadal won both won 3 grand slam events in the last 2 years and djokovic won only 2 Sunil ? . NO "advantage over the last couple of years" not on this planet as I see. That's one less than Federer and Nadal over a "couple of years" .Couple is two.

    • profile image

      JayTipps 

      6 months ago

      Nadal " OF ALL TIME" . Djokovic could be hit by a bus tomorrow. Has a shot if he keeps winning bit still a lot to do to be "BEST OF ALL TIME"

    • profile image

      Sunil 

      6 months ago

      over the last couple of years it is clearly evident that Djoko has a clear advantage over Rafa and Roger and his performance stays same at all counts, i.e., grass, clay or hard court

    • profile image

      Robespierre 

      6 months ago

      I do not know who is the greatest, I only know that Djokovic with top game is the best.

    • profile image

      JayTipps 

      6 months ago

      Continued. Nadal is a clay court player won 11 of his grand slam titles on clay only 6 on other surfaces. On the other hand Federer is a grass/hard court player. There are 4 grand slam titles to be won every year 1 hard 1 clay 2 grass. If there were 2 hard 2 clay 2 grass would that mean both Nadal and Federer would have won twice the amount of clay and hard court titles. If so Federer would be on 26 not 20. However Nadal would be on 31 not 17. Also in 3 year less time. Nadal is overall the best tennis player to grace a tennis court (but not on grass).

    • profile image

      JayTipps 

      6 months ago

      I personally think Nadal is the bast ever tennis player at this point in time. Why? .Although Federer has won more Grand Slam singles titles 20 vs Nadal's 17 there is more to it. Firstly Nadal turned pro 2001 as opposed to Federer who turned pro 1998 so has entered 76 gran slam tournaments Nadal has entered only 54 thats 22 less but only 3 gran slam titles behind . This show up as a 87.28% win rate at grand sman events as opposed to Federer who stands at 86.3% win. rate.Head to head stand at 24 vs 15 to Nadal big difference eh. To be continued.

    • profile image

      Alians 

      7 months ago

      all of you have internet! so, statistics aside for now look who sent Fed and Rafa to retirement, two widely considered the best ever!!be objectiv..serv, return, base line game, beckend, passing, defence, stamina, fairplay, surface is not matter...most complete ever!!! this is d Sparta!!! now just a little stats

      fed 2004-2009 24gs 20 finals 14 wins (philipusis, gonzales, bagdatis, soderling, 34 yo Agassi, Safin, Roddick 4x, Hewitt, ...11 gs against them)

      Nadal in the meantime(ferrer, soderling,puerta, berdych,anderson, thiem 0 gs )

      ???? 2011-2016 24 gs 18 finals 11 wins (Fed 4x, Nadal 7x, Murray 7x...) what???what we talking about??

    • profile image

      a;flsjdk 

      7 months ago

      get absolutely outvoted kids. stop trying to nitpick everything.

    • profile image

      Ratko 

      7 months ago

      Have you changed the list? Novak Djokovic Serbian terminator.

    • profile image

      AlexisPnevmatikos 

      7 months ago

      No one ever talks about Ivan Lendl. He played in perhaps the most difficult era with the likes of McEnroe and Borg (and even Connors) and then Wilander, Becker, and Edberg as Sampras coming in. Lendl won 8 slams, played in 8 straight US Open finals, and although he lost his 2 Wimbledon finals appearances, imagine his Wimbledon record on today’s slower grass. Federer came in during a time-of-transition (as Sampras, whom I think was always overrated by the way, was on his way out) and Nadal/ Djokovic were not yet around. Federer and Nadal (who has had no consistent competition at the French over his decade+ of dominance) would be hard-pressed to crack 10 GS if they would have played in the 80s. This, in my opinion, leaves Djokovic (and his all-around game) as perhaps the best (or second best) and the one would have been right in the mix of best players of the 80s.

      So while Lendl doesn’t have the flamboyance of many of the players on this Top 10 list and was never the media-darling like some of the other players, I have no doubt that he should be top 3 in terms of GOAT. So the question begs: Why isn’t Lendl higher on your list?

      My Top 6:

      1. Laver

      2. Djokovic

      3. Lendl

      4. Borg (greatest combination of grass and clay talent; 11 GS in 10 short years)

      5. Nadal

      6. Federer (his French title deserves an *)

    • profile image

      john lynch 

      7 months ago

      my top 3 list is 1.nadal.2.djokovic.3.federer(lance 2).

    • profile image

      William Rothwell 

      7 months ago

      Why on earth is tim henman not in the top 3?????? Im dissatisfied

    • profile image

      Gene 

      7 months ago

      I grew up watching 70's and 80's tennis a lot. Taking the rackets, strings and the hi tech gear of the 21st century out of the equation, if all these players were the same age, I doubt anyone could ever come close to the speed & ability of John McEnroe.

      Also, as a side note, I think Nastase and Becker should also be in your list.

    • profile image

      Tennis fan 

      7 months ago

      Placing Novak at 5 is malicious... The guy won it all. He won all GS and Masters 1000, and he is the first in history to have done it. He is also the first man holding all four GS at the same time on 3 different surfaces(and all that while the two from the list were there). The first two from the list are trembling when they see him on the courth... He beat both of them on their favourite surfaces. He is better tha Fed on Wimbledon 2-1(2 matches won in the final) which is his home courth, He won against Nadal 7 consecutive matches(two times)... He beat them so much that the world hates him... Cuz they were very popular when he came on the scene. In my opinion 1.Novak 2. Rafa 3. Roger... With all respekt, but others from history were not on that level of tennis...

    • profile image

      Anoma Hettige 

      7 months ago

      What exactly do these "all time greatest" top ten types of lists prove? In my opinion absolutely nothing. There are too many variables to group all of these players into one bunch. Each of the player's mentioned and so many others who aren't mentioned deserve to be remembered for that moment in time when they were the greatest - and why can't we leave it at that?

    • profile image

      Igor 

      8 months ago

      Its like There are only Slams for this guy. Djokovic: complete package in all courts. 13 slams. 29 masters. Sampras: 14 slams. Inexistant on clay. 14 slams. 11 masters. And the Guy places him ahead of djokovic. No logic!

    • profile image

      lesliehowardgargan@gmail.com 

      8 months ago

      Surely there's a place for Pancho Gonzales?

    • profile image

      Sardar meena 

      8 months ago

      Nadal is greatest ever......

      When Nadal entered the real tennis games played. Age and peak of player form it's easy to say that Nadal dominance remained in each head to head encounter. He can play great tennis on any surface and he is complete alrounder player in every stroke.

    • profile image

      Joe Dwek 

      8 months ago

      Nadal is undoubtedly the best player ever. If it hadn't been for his continuous mishap he would have definitely surpassed Federer. Federer took advantage of Nadal mishaps to obtain more grand slams. But the record shows head to head Nadal has beaten him eight times more. Federer never won the Olympics, never won the Davis Cup.

    • profile image

      Crash Bandicoot 

      8 months ago

      Why is 10. two times?

    • profile image

      nebojsa 

      9 months ago

      Placing Novak at number 5 while he was playing during Nadal/Federer era... Not just that, he won 13 GS titles while those 2 were active. Rethink your list.

    • Jodah profile image

      John Hansen 

      9 months ago from Queensland Australia

      This is a wonderful list and comparison, Bill. Although, there are a number of other wonderful players I think you have selected the best ten. I also feel at the time of writing Roger Federer has to be regarded as the best, despite Djokovic defeating Nadal in the Wimbledon semi-final and Federer being knocked out by Kevin Anderson. Djokovic could possibly go on to eclipse Federer in time but injuries could play a part..

      Rod Laver is the one hardest to line up and is arguably the best player of all time considering his record, however his short stature 5'7" may have made it difficult to compete effectively with some of the much taller and huge serving players today.

    • profile image

      #lucyintheskies 

      9 months ago

      no one has played prettier tennis ever than Federer has...especially when he was younger, it is like watching ballet-tennis...

    • profile image

      Time Will Tell 

      9 months ago

      I think the argument for "GOAT" is highly subjective and difficult to quantify. That being said, I'm not sure who I would currently put as the best ever—although, I would lean more towards Nadal.

      Federer has 20 grand slam titles and the most weeks at 1st, but Federer began to accumulate these accomplishments with relatively easy competition (Safin, Roddick, Coria, Nalbadian, etc.). Federer had already won 4 Grand Slam titles and began accumulating his 1st place weeks (2004 - 2008) before Nadal was 18 years old. Once Nadal came in to the picture, the "Federer dominance" quickly changed.

      Nadal, on the other hand, entered the world of professional tennis during Federer's prime. Just look at the level of competition he has faced. From the onset, he has faced Federer at his best, only to keep competing with him while Djokovic went on to hit his prime as well. Nadal, and Djokovic as well, have faced the toughest level of competition that any tennis player has ever seen. Both have always had 2 elite level, top-10 players of all time standing between them and the Grand Slam titles. Federer had an easy start.

    • profile image

      Backhanded Compliment 

      9 months ago

      Pancho Gonzalez was one heck of a player.

      At least top 5.

    • profile image

      Tennis player 

      9 months ago

      I asked this question above and it was answered, but I still think that the homogenization of playing surfaces today make it easier for modern players to accumulate slams. In other words, grass is not as fast as it used to be and (I believe but am not sure) the clay is not as slow.

      I think Nadal would have had a tougher time winning Wimbledon on a 90s Wimbledon surface, for instance.

      Consequently, I think the modern players are overrated a bit compared to the greats of yesteryear. When I asked this question, the author essentially responded that the best players rise to the top no matter the surface. However, I think lowering the differences between playing surfaces undoubtedly helps the modern player.

      Therefore, I don't think you should automatically put modern players with greater than 10 slams in the top 5 all-time.

    • profile image

      GOATORSHEEP 

      10 months ago

      Laver could be considered the best ever, honestly.. but it is admittedly speculative that he would have won many more slams.(though not very...he missed 20 potential slam opportunities all while he was world number 1 and still won 11 total slams.)

      That said, Federer is the best ever and Rafa is not better.

      ...

      Rafa could become better by the end of his career but he isn't right now. H2H is really not a very relevant argument unless you have nearly identical achievements and your matches account for all scenarios.

      for example, a player that is 8-0 against Fed, but with 0 weeks at #1 and 0 slams would not be considered better than Federer.

      Nor would a player that is 8-0 against him, with half as many weeks at #1 and half as many slams...

      Nor would a player that is 8-0 against him with 13 slams and only 200 weeks at no. 1.

      It goes on and on until you eventually get Rafael Nadal. Rafa has 8 more wins than Fed (23-15), but 3 less slams, and ONLY 177 weeks at no. 1.

      Until he has at least equal slams and even ALMOST as many equal weeks at no. 1, then H2H is practically irrelevant.

      I hate when people use the H2H argument to say that Rafa is better. Not only has he had a significant advantage (15 of 38 matched have been on clay), but he is 13-2 on clay and 10-13 on every other surface vs fed,) The only thing that H2H displays is that Rafa is significantly better than Federer on clay, but we already knew that... You don't get the name "King of Clay" for nothing.

      I don't see any of the people arguing for Rafa because of H2H arguing that Novak is better than Nadal, but the H2H argument would make Novak the greatest ever as he has a winning record against both Federer AND Nadal.

      Why don't you argue for him then? He even has 45 more weeks at no. 1 than Nadal!!! It's because he has only 11 slams. You see, H2H is totally unfair and unnecessary unless you are using it as a tiebreak condition. As it stands, the career achievements between Rafa and Federer are not a tie.

      wait until Rafa equals Fed's slams and has at least 90-95% of Fed's weeks at no. 1.

      Even then, remember that Nadal has been fortunate to play 15 of their 38 matches on his best surface, while Roger has only been able to play 3 of their matches on his best surface.

      Doing a little statistics shows you that if their matches had been played evenly across all surfaces, that their H2H would project to be

      Rafa 20.89 wins

      Rog 17.08 wins.

      Doing Statistics so that Roger would get to play 15 of the 38 on his best surface projects the H2H as

      Rafa 16.6 wins

      Rog 21.4 wins

      then you guys would be saying that it's not fair because Federer is better on grass and he played 15 matches on grass.

      It's a stupid argument. No one should use H2H unless every other indicator is basically tied... Otherwise say that Novak is the GOAT... at least you'd be consistent. Or would it be Andy Roddick whos 5-4 against Novak? Or what about Kyrgios who's 2-0 against him?

      Stop it.

    • profile image

      T Hernandez 

      10 months ago

      Federer is certainly one of the greats and has the best overall record, but if, like in boxing, you have a 15:23 record against an opponent then your opponent is better than you.

      NADAL has beaten him 23 times while Federer has one only won 15. Logic dictates that NADAL is better and therefore the best ever.

    • profile image

      James 

      10 months ago

      Fred Perry

    • profile image

      TheGame 

      10 months ago

      Nadal is the GOAT. Beat peak Fed at Wimbledon and AO finals but Fed never managed to even take Nadal to 5 sets at the French in 5 meetings

    • profile image

      @You 

      10 months ago

      These are BRITISH tennis players

    • profile image

      Siddharth 

      10 months ago

      Greatest player at Australian is #novak greatest tennis player and my favorite #rafa@ at French open and legend of tennis #fedrer@ at Wimbledon and usopen champion yet .................

    • profile image

      chekwube 

      10 months ago

      Roger Federer is the best his gram slam awards speaks volume.

    • profile image

      Roger 

      11 months ago

      I seen Jimmy Connors in his days

      To win 109 titles with three letters I think he should be no 7 not ivan lendl the cry baby.

    • profile image

      Marta Steinbeck 

      12 months ago

      Why is Rob Laver ranked #3 at all. He should be lower. Borg should be above him. Yes he won the gram slams twice but writers failed to say that 3 of those GS were played on grass and only Roland Garros was played on dirt. Imagine Nadal playing 3 GS on clay court or Fed playing or HC. Also Sampras should be lower too since he couldnt play on clay at all. He was a one trick pony with a fast serve.

    • profile image

      Prashanta Bardhan 

      12 months ago

      Roger Federer is not only the greatest Tennis player ever, he is the greatest athlete of all time too.

    • profile image

      Welc Golder 

      12 months ago

      Pete Sampras should be 3 instead of Rod Laver

    • profile image

      James 

      13 months ago

      Roger federer is the best, it proven!

    • profile image

      Paul Green 

      13 months ago

      I think Pancho Gonzalez was the great est tennis player of all time. He was the best in the world for about 10 years. Unfortunately, the professionals were not able to play in the major championships until he was 40 years old.

    • profile image

      Peter 

      13 months ago

      We will never know whether Rod Laver or Roger is the greatest. We can't compare. I go for Roger though as his career coincided with other greats. And what most overlook is that Roger was always the oldest on the court when he clashed with the others in the BIG FOUR club.

    • profile image

      parviz mofidi 

      13 months ago

      Roger Federer is the GREATEST TENNIS PLAYER OF ALL . how can people doubt this. some of the other players listed are very good. but Federer is the GOAT.

    • profile image

      Luke 

      13 months ago

      Now 304 weeks at #1 and counting.

    • profile image

       

      13 months ago

      Novak Djokovic beat Federer and Nadal a lot soo he is the best ever

    • profile image

      Mirgik 

      14 months ago

      Who is the greatest tennis player of all time?

    • profile image

      Warren R. Moulds 

      14 months ago

      See that wood stick in #4's hands? Only a couple of the top 10 listed here could play with that. Today's racquet technology has completely changed how players prepare, play (power vs. finesse) and strategize on ever-changing surfaces. Me thinks Laver would acquit himself better than #4 and be right there with #1.

    • profile image

      Mileta Cekoci 

      14 months ago

      You have a computed list based on real facts, rather then opinions, here: http://www.ultimatetennisstatistics.com/goatList

      Thought it is limited to Open Era, but has configurable weights so you can play with what you think is important.

      There are list by each of the surfaces as well, and many more.

    • profile image

      Gottfried 

      14 months ago

      I would argue that if Rafa was not injured he would actually have "less" titles. Reason being, you have to take it both ways. He has been able to achieve extraordinary success due to his willingness to extend himself beyond even what his body would allow him to. Had he not exerted himself as much, he would have less Grand Slams.

    • profile image

      MB 

      14 months ago

      It’s Roger Rafa then Novak. They all played in the same era where you have to have an all court game to succeed. Any one of the three would have 25+ slams now if the other two didn’t exist. They will be the top 3 on the slams count and they all have career grand slams already.

    • profile image

      Sar 

      14 months ago

      Undoubtedly Federer is the greatest of all time.

    • profile image

      Lucienne Rosset 

      14 months ago

      please correct Tederer's CV: not 19, but 20 Grand Slam titles,

      6 Australian!

      Thanks!

    • profile image

      Gus 

      14 months ago

      Federer and Nadal the best ever.......?

    • profile image

      DDT 

      14 months ago

      Rafael Nadal is without a doubt the greatest player ever!!!!...IF it wasnt for his injuries he would have won more than 20 Slams

    • profile image

      B MOHAN 

      14 months ago

      20 grand slam titles; 20 years in the top 10; And the longest tenure as world No:1. Has anyone else achieved this? NO! What other yardstick can be used to select the all-time best ?

      ROGER FEDERER

    • profile image

      Sajid 

      14 months ago

      Without any doubt the Greatest player Tennis Court has ever saw is none other than THE GREAT ROGER FEDERER. He is the best, phenomenal player of the Game.

    • profile image

      Benny Seni 

      14 months ago

      The best tennis player of all times without a doubt is Alan Dale Lee. The guys has more grand slams than the number of teeth in his mouth. Just check him out.

    • profile image

      Nihal 

      14 months ago

      andy murray should be here he is the greatest player of all time

    • profile image

      Keith beaumobt 

      14 months ago

      Why do they always forget. Ken rosewall

    • profile image

      Neophytos 

      14 months ago

      Djokovic should be above Sampras in my opinion. Easily. He reached a higher level with an obviously better well-rounded game.

    • profile image

      Beni 

      15 months ago

      Why don't you have in the list Ilie Nastase? He was better than Bjorn Borg (they played in the same period) and even ATP says about Ilie Nastase that he was the most talented tennis player of all time!

    • profile image

      Pat Rafter 

      15 months ago

      Obviously written by an American. There are a big list of players who should be above half this list, they just happen to not be Americans.

    • profile image

      G-man 

      15 months ago

      All these tennis players are great, I have no top pick, but I love Rafa for never giving up and grinding through ever tough match. I do not think there is any tennis player who can match his intensity and focus on court.

    • profile image

      Mehmood 

      15 months ago

      Where is Boris Becker, Stefan Edberg guys, they were also most popular, loved & great players of their time.

    • profile image

      Censuwine 

      15 months ago

      What about Wilander? He also won on all surfaces - the Australian Open used to be played on grass when he won it. I would take Sampras out and put Wilander in. Beyond the serve and volley kind of game that is possible on the fast surfaces, Sampras was only marginally above average on the slow courts. He couldn't compete in Paris to save his life.

    • profile image

      tennis fan Norway 

      15 months ago

      Andy Murray should be on that top 10 list. Winning that many big trophies playing in the same era as Roger, Rafa and Novak is an enormous achievement.

    • profile image

      Ugljesa23 

      15 months ago

      I don't think there is a single greatest player of all time (there is the most successful though), but the trio of Roger, Rafa and Novak is the best, as each of them has achieved what the other two has not. Why? Federer won 19 Grand Slams (the vast majority of them prior to Nadal-Novak maturing) and is record holder in #1 weeks. On the other hand, he had not beaten Nadal in any GS match for 10 years (!), and has not beaten Novak in a GS final since 2007. He holds negative H2Hs vs both his biggest rivals, and it was only in 2017 that he somewhat improved his devastating H2H vs Nadal. He has never beaten Nadal in Roland Garros, never played 5 setter there, never beaten him in Monte Carlo or Rome. Both Federer and Novak not only achieved what Sampras could not even come close to (RG title), but they did it in Nadal's era. Nadal holds a negative H2H vs Novak, with two 0-7 streaks, the last of which included 0-15 sets. An undisputed champion of clay, the best ever who played on that surface. Novak is to be praised as he fought out his way to accompany these two - unbelievable and undisputed champions of their time - only to find his place on equal terms - holding a positive H2H vs both, having beaten both in each GS, including Rafa 3-0 in RG and on any other Master-series clay court. The only of the three to have won the Grand Slam (the holder of the four in the same time), an ATP points record holder (16950), played 17 consecutive finals and a winner of 8/9 Masters (with 5 lost Cincinnati finals). Novak has never beaten Rafa in RG final and overall lost there 6 times to him. Both Roger and Novak hold negative H2H to Rafa in wins/losses in GS finals. Nole and Rafa played record 50 matches, Nole-Federer 45. So, you see - unless you are a casual tennis fan who believes that his idol pees gold - it is not really that one player is truly the best ever. I believe that this trio is something this sport have never seen and will likely never see again - as they have achieved what they did while constantly playing each other. Once any of them retires, this sport won't be the same.

    • profile image

      Marko 

      15 months ago

      .First time Djokovic defeated Federer in GS when Federer was 27 yo (it was on AO 2008 in semifinal!) No more no less.And again in 2011, AO semifinal, Federer lost to Novak when He was 30 yo.Wimbledon 2011, Federer lost QF to Tsonga.And so on and on...Federer hasn't won US open for 10 years (last time it was in 2008).On Aussie last time was on 2017, after 7 long years.Wimbledon after 5 years in 2017.Novak wasn't there (finished earlier due to health problems).In those years from 2012 to 2017,it was domination of Novak and Nadal.And it's nothing to do with Federer's old years, but to strong competition.

    • profile image

      Ryder 

      15 months ago

      Well these tennis players are amazing

    • profile image

      15 months ago

      ? list is not correct in my opinion

    • profile image

      orisraeli 

      15 months ago

      nadal is the best

    • profile image

      todd saed 

      16 months ago

      Pancho Gonzalez beat Rod Laver, Don BUdge beat him, Ellsworth VInes and Jack Kramer could also beat anybody, any era, lack of tennis history knowledge here, big time,Pancho the best, Bud COllins said it too

    • profile image

      Prashant S Akerkar 

      16 months ago

      It was great watching games between Bjorn Borg and John McEnroe.

      Same with Federer and Nadal.

      Thanks & Regards,

      Prashant S Akerkar

    • profile image

      dave 

      16 months ago

      borg is the greatest having won 11 slams in a year period .had he not retired would have easy eclipsed the others

    • profile image

      Aj 

      16 months ago

      313131 What are you on about? Federer is the best. Period.

    working

    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, howtheyplay.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://howtheyplay.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

    Show Details
    Necessary
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Features
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Marketing
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Statistics
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)